I don't want to debate the merits of Jim Rice and Bert Blyleven making the Hall of Fame. But given it took them so many years to get in there was reasonable doubt by many voters on their careers as Hall of Fame careers. The questions ...
Are more marginal Hall of Fame players getting into the Hall because writers aren't voting for certain players like McGwire and Palmeiro and feel they need to vote for someone?
Does a player need to be on the ballot for fifteen years. He's not getting better while retired. I can see a player being overlooked in a big year of studs becoming eligible. But shouldn't it be more like five years? It would maintain an eliteness to the Hall.
Original Post