Skip to main content

I'm having a discussion with a guy at work about his son's 11 U team.  He was in the quarterfinals of a big tournament this past weekend, an elimination game.

 

Bottom 7, tie game, and they give up a leadoff triple.  Get the next two outs, and the other teams big huge hitter comes up.  They intentionally walk him and get the next guy out.  They go on to win the game, but lose the next game, and were done for the weekend.

 

I said even though it would be considered good baseball strategy to do it, I said it was odd to do it at that age group.  Why not let his pitcher pitch to the kid, and learn how to get the big guy out instead of learning how to walk a guy.  I asked what the pitcher learned from that.  He said the team learned a great lesson in baseball strategy.  I said they could do that by watching a game on TV.  I was probably being an A$$, but I then said all he did was show everyone at the park that he was a smart baseball mind, and that he took the ball out of his teams hand when the game was on the line.

 

So who is right?  Is walking kids at that age good baseball?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm OK with good baseball strategy at any age, especially if it's strategy that would still be realistic at HS ages. In tournament baseball, especially at the higher levels (even in younger age groups), you play to win in bracket play (within reason, anyway).  Pool play and non-tournament play you can take more risks to "test" guys.

I have no problem with it in an important 11U Majors tournament.   But if you're going to walk the big bopper and have 1st and 3rd, you might as well walk the next guy, load them up,  get even deeper in the order, and let your pitcher go from the windup.

 

edited to add -- this is why in upper level youth competition it's good to have your best hitter bat one, not three.

Last edited by JCG

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×