Skip to main content

So, your son is playing in a PG event, you know what is coming.  Your son's team will be assigned to a pool, the teams in that pool play each other, then the #1 team (and sometimes #2 team) advance to the next round and everyone else gets consolation games.  This is just how it is, except for the WWBA Labor Day Classic at LakePoint (Freshman) this weekend.

When the schedule first came out it was exactly as described above then it changed from 3 pools to one pool.  Each team will NOW get two games then the Sunday game will be based on your seeding # of 1-13, at that point if you win you move on, if you loose you go to the consolation game, with a 4 game guarantee.

Is PG testing a new format with the Freshman at LakePoint?  This format WILL change the way every coach will approach this PG event.  I think this will also have a HUGE impact on not overusing youth pitchers at PG events.  Think about it, if you no longer HAVE to win your two games in your pool to advance then you won't see the top 4 pitchers pitching 30 pitches and switching out for three straight days. The teams can pitch their lower level kids without it removing the team from the tourney and you get to save your big guns for Sunday.  This means less innings for the better pitchers and more innings for the less experienced pitchers, without it affecting if the team advances or not.  This could be a really good thing. 

Has anyone heard if this is a test?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I would think it's just because it's a smaller tourney.  I don't see how you could make this work with 300+ teams like some of their bigger events have....there just aren't enough hours in the day to allow every team to make the playoff.  Cooperstown does it with 104 teams...but they have 32 fields....all in one location so there are no travel issues.  Even at that it takes 3 days to get thru it....imagine trying to do it with 300 teams....on fields scattered in a 2 hour radius....just don't think it's feasible

The biggest issue is that the younger age groups seldom have the large rosters that the older teams show up with.  Less pitching available in many cases.  Also, the larger tournaments are all a week long so the starting pitchers, even if they throw a complete game, on the first day can come back and throw in the playoffs.  

I wasn't thinking it was for the older kids, I thought this might be a test for the younger groups.  There are 13 teams in this event, but there are only 12 teams in the similar event in FT. Myers this weekend and they are following the traditional format.

There have been some grumbling in the younger ages about coaches putting in multiple kids per game for 30 pitches each.  If your pool play performance won't eliminate a team this could really change the pitching dynamic for the smaller kids.  

If I read the pitch smart guidelines right the coach can use their stud pitcher for 30 pitches on Friday, AND Saturday, AND game 1 of Sunday, and then pitch the 4th game to 80+ pitches.  It would be cruddy of the coach to do that but it seems to be allowed.  I would think this new format would allow the weaker pitchers to get in some serious mound time because the coach wouldn't be worried that if they lost game 1 they were done.

One of the better events my son played in this past summer was a V-tool event where you are scheduled for four games over three days.  And that's it.  No advancing/declining/trophies pitch count what if worries.  Coaches scheduled their pitchers/position players based on what they wanted to see and that was it.

If one of the goals in a larger tournament is to truly get the best 16 (or 32 or whatever) teams into the bracket, then the way USA baseball does it is kind of interesting, and I think it worked well. Going from memory here, but for the 14U Arizona tournament in 2015, it went something like this:

  • 16 pools of 4 teams. Each team plays the other three teams in its pool.
  • Then, the teams are seeded 1-64 for a fourth game. #1 plays #2, #3 plays #4, etc.
  • Then the teams are re-seeded and the top 16 advance to bracket play

The advantage is, if there are two or more of the top teams in one pool, they get the chance to get out of their pool without winning it. Conversely, if a pool is weak, the winner can be knocked out in the fourth game. 

As it turned out in 2015, 3 of the 4 teams in a single pool made the 16-team bracket and then made the semifinals of the entire tournament. Yes, that's an extreme example of a stacked pool (and God help the 4th team in that pool!) but in a traditional format two of those teams would have been SOL, and the overall bracket would have been weaker as a result. 

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×