Calbb,starzz,
quote:
BigHit- I think the pulldown phase is a great tool. I feel that it teaches good arm acceleration and finish as well as giving a mind-body connection to finishing with proper throwing mechanics. By implimenting the pull down phase you can incorporate the same arm speed at 60' as you have at 300' (a great tool that has helped velocity immensely).
Sure can't hurt!
I understand the concept and agree that it is a good tool.
It is mimicing underload training and that is a good thing. I would just prefer to do underload training instead.
quote:
The pulldown process, if done correctly, keeps them focused on a lower plane and aids in getting their arm strength to develop so that a kid may be able to toss on a line at 200 feet, when 4-5 weeks earlier he was @ 120 ft max on pull down strength
I guess keeping a lower release point is important to the system. I have never advocated or agreed that long tossing effects a release point to the degree that it needs to be retaught afterward. I feel that throwing from a mound or from your position teaches that muscle memory. It may be more advantageous for position players than pitchers from that stand point because at no time in a long toss program is it going to mimic a mound release, simply becasue you are not throwing from a mound.
I would submit that their ability to throw on the line would occur whether they did the pulldowns or not. JMO
Don't get me wrong here. It is a good program and I see the definite benefits of throwing to air it out on the way out and stay on line on the way in. I am not inferring that it is dangerous. It is the best long toss program on the market. I have just made adjustments with using underload training instead. I respect Jaegers system. As i said. It is well thought out.
Thanks for then responses. I would not want anybody tom think that I was dissing Jaeger.