I am a peak performance kinesiologist. I wanted to start a discussion on the mental side of hitting.
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:I am a peak performance kinesiologist. I wanted to start a discussion on the mental side of hitting.
quote:It's been claimed that 90% of hitting is half-mental. From a kinesiological perspective, can this be validated?
quote:Originally posted by YoungGunDad:
I think most Posters on here would like to talk about that particular subject but I'm not to sure about the part of your advertising here.
Just my opinion.
quote:Originally posted by floridafan:
So what is the "mental" side of hitting? Is it "reading" a pitch? Being prepared to unload on a ball? Having a "presence" at the plate? Where does this discussion go?
quote:Originally posted by fillsfan:
There is a very good book called The Mental Game of Baseball by HA Dorfman. Book gives many case studies of MLBers who need help with the mental or confidence side of their game. Even high level pros can lack confidence and doubt their abilities.
The book gives many examples on how to overcome the mental part of the game.
Negative thoughts lead to negative results and visa versa whether hitting, pitching or fielding. The book gives ways to handle the negative thoughts and replace them with positive ones.
I think overcoming the mental challenges of baseball makes a player reach his full talent potential.
e.g. My son comes into to pitch with the bases loaded late in a game with a one run lead. Proceeds to hit the batter with the first pitch he threw. After the game I asked what happened. He tells me that while warming up on the mound all kept saying to himself was "don't hit this batter, don't hit this batter." Classic situation as described in the book.
A good read for all baseball players (and parents).
quote:Originally posted by OK2Go:
For me, the mental part of hitting is defined with a word fillsfan used above, "confidence".
MY DEFINITION OF CONFIDENCE;
Take a naturally athletic player. Show them proper methods. Reinforce the teaching of sound mechanics with hours of quality repetition in a variety of conditions and you develop, "confidence". NOW your mentally prepared to hit!
Seems like a lot of stuff to go through just to be successful approximately 3 out of every 10 attempts, huh. Just imagine what we would have to go through if the physical part of hitting wasn't so easy.
chuckle....snicker....chuckle...
quote:Originally posted by fillsfan:
OK2Go, and I agree with the repetition idea. I believe a player gets better, or improves his game, over the winter when he properly does something hundreds or thousands of times. If a hitters gets
7000-10000 quality swings in, under the supervision of good coaches, between November and February he is improving his swing and gaining confidence.
quote:Originally posted by OLDSLUGGER8:
Its no secret I am from the school of hitters are born. It starts there, and snowballs into greater success or ultimate failure if the ability to adjust is lacking.
Mental approach to me means mental preparation, but the trigger is still a physical response, and some do it better than others.
Some simple and crude examples are this:
Assume the player has the required physical aspects, such as solid hand-eye and twitch muscle capability. He also has the power, the short to-long follow technique downpat. It all comes down to approach.
Say the pitcher knows anything downtown will be launched into orbit. The ultimate goal of the pitcher becomes junk and location, and an out-of-zone fastball to keep things honest.
What does the hitter do? What does the cerebral hitter do?
This is why MLB looks for pole-2-pole power, using the whole field, ability to turn on a fastball(mistake pitch), and so on.
You can teach mental approach, but the hitter needs the physical gifts to pull off all those adjustments, 1/3 of the time.
The easy way out is too sit on the junk.
quote:Originally posted by ILVBB:
I am going to take a different tack with this discussion.
I am big believer in hitters are "trained" to hit. I know, what an obvious statement. However, most people really don't think about how and when kids learn.
I can remember many a little league game with parents yelling "a walk is as good as a hit." A true statement, but what is the message that they are passing on to an 8-12 year old? The kid is sitting there, not wanting to make a mistake, not wanting to strike out and what does he do? He freezes. After a while this becomes part of his learned behavior, if I don't swing maybe I will walk. Or alternatively, maybe I will wait until I have 2 strikes and take a swing then.
I go back to my years of coaching, I tried to instill in kids, that hitting was fun. Go up there take a hack, if you hit the ball hard you accomplished something. The message was fundementally different, the game is tough enough, why let kids worry about making a mistake when it is suppose to be fun.
Moving foward several years latter, my son has taken that basic premise to his college level game. His purpose when he steps into the batters box is hit the ball hard. He has learned the numbers of the game better and become more selective, but he still goes up with the "I am going to knock the cover off the ball attitude." It is a simple philosophy, but if you make too much of the game you loose the joy with that failure starts to get the better of you.
So much for in-depth "psycho nonsense."
quote:Originally posted by ClevelandDad:
hkrelax - your first two posts started out a little rocky but since then have been excellent. You can be a positive force here on the hsbbweb and I'll also consider visiting your website.
Question - bottom of the ninth, two outs, guy on third base with tying run. Assume both the pitcher and the hitter are using every mental tool in the book and are both operating with 100% confidence and mental visualiizations in that situation. Which one wins? Do we just go back to the tried and true baseball percentages at that point and predict the hitter will have about a 30% chance to succeed?
Obviously, it is unlikely that two players would ever be so equally matched mentally so someone who might brush off the mental side training might in fact be placing themselves at a disadvantage.