Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The Ivy league uses something called an Academic Index for recruiting...it can be very confusing as it combines sat/gpa/class rank and then uses the total student body mean AI to then structure the academic make-up for athletic teams...it has to balance out...here is something I wrote on it for a past newsletter..............

Does your school use class rankings? It might hurt your Ivy League acceptance chances!

The Ivy League incorporates a system to control the academic quality and quantity of student athletes that are recruited each year. This system is called the Academic Index and every student at the school, not just athletes, is assigned one based on a formula that uses class rank, GPA, and SAT or ACT.

Each Ivy League school generates an average academic index score for the entire student body and uses that score as the center point for recruiting. The statistical variable known as a standard deviation is used as a guide for how much off the school mean a coach can recruit a PSA.

For example, suppose that the mean AI is 200, and the standard deviation is 13. A given team may be able to recruit 1 or 2 players who are up to 1.5 standard deviations below the average (AI of 181-187, 3-5 players who are up to 1 standard deviation away from the norm (AI of 188-199), 2-4 players who are at the norm (200-212) and 1-2 who are above the norm AI (213+). Confused? Wait it gets more complex.

Talent factors into this equation as well. To be in that group which is 1.5 standard deviations away from the norm, you need to be a tremendous talent – an impact player, a player that is being offered by scholarship schools. A coach might recruit you if you are in that second group of 3-5 players, but not in the first group of 1-2 (because you are not a good enough player in his/her mind). Maybe you only need 1 or 2 AI points to move up a group. A 10 point increase on the SAT will get you one point on the AI, this could mean the difference between getting a Likely Letter (basically a promise that you are accepted before you even apply) and not getting in!

What a lot of people don’t realize is that students with high GPA’s in high schools which do not use class rank, typically outscore peers with the same GPA but whose high school uses class rank (because of how the AI formula works). Ivy League coaches, who must recruit in a complex world of Academic Indexes correlated with athletic ability, usually sleep a bit easier when they know a prospect’s school does not use class rank.

Basically, attending a school that does not use class rank can bump you up about 10 AI points across the board. This difference does not just help those who fall outside of the 1.5 standard deviation level, but it also helps those who are within that range, but are not considered talented enough to be recruited by the school unless they are in the 2nd, 3rd or 4th group. It helps everyone.

What am I saying? At this date in time, if you are Ivy League minded, it pays to attend a school that does not use class rank. You can do whatever you want with that information; I am just trying to inform you.
1200 seems to be the magic number that can generate interest from Ivy coaches. Our son had an SAT quite a bit higher than this. College coach strongly encouraged son to take SAT again to try and improve his score. As Advisor mentioned above, class rank was very helpful to son's admission index; as was a physics related extra-curricular project.

Another helpful site for info on Ivy admissions: http://www.collegeconfidential.com/
Chris Lincoln wrote a very good book on the intricacies of recruiting in the Ivy League entitled "Playing The Game - Inside Athletic Recruiting In The Ivy League". In his book, he does a pretty good job of explaining the process .... he uses lots of examples pertaining to football, s****r, LaCrosse, Hockey, Basketball but (to my recollection) never specifically mentions baseball; though I have to imagine it does not differ toooo much from the other sports.

As the other posters have said, recruiting in the Ivy league is unique and a bit more involved.
BeenthereIL, I agree with your disagreement.

I have been doing a lot of research on this subject. I asked this question of dbg on the Dartmouth website and he was kind enough to respond with a PM. From reading these posts I know your son was a highly recruited athlete (and doing well I see) and had his choice of top schools. I was hoping you might share your experience as to the academic side of the admissions/recruiting process at P-ton? Any insights as to your experience would be greatly appreciated.
Last edited by GitErDone
Our son was recruited by several Ivy's as a pitcher. 3.7 and 1200 and 90+ seemed to be good enough. harvard, yale, brown and dartmouth. also, was good enough for Duke as they offered him healthy money to go. he opted for another academically competitive ACC school but the Ivys were very tough to pass up as a parent.
Bags,
Keep in mind, as Tr mentions, football is different than baseball in terms of recruiting. Football has a system known as banding. The lowest band, which are the minimums you mention only allow 2 "impact" players to be accepted with those minimun academics. Baseball players (and the rest of the football team) are held to a much higher standard. See advisor's earlier post.
Last edited by GitErDone

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×