Here ya' go, trh. {And no, I am not a tsip fan.}
"Tonight's Rose Bowl Champions vs. the '85 Bears
By ALLEN BARRA
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
January 4, 2006; Page D8
Twenty years ago, the Chicago Bears, regarded by many pro-football historians as the most dominant team in National Football League history, capped an 18-1 season by crushing the New England Patriots 46-10 in the Super Bowl. Some wonder how those Bears would match up against this year's champions. Not necessarily this year's pro champion, but the college champion -- which will be determined tonight when the University of Southern California Trojans play the Texas Longhorns in the Rose Bowl.
It's increasingly difficult to distinguish top-level college football from the professional game. Some comparisons between the 2005 Trojans and Longhorns and the 1985 Bears are eye-opening. The '85 Bears had perhaps the greatest defense in NFL history; according to the Sports Encyclopedia -- Pro Football, Chicago averaged 271 pounds a man across its defensive line. This year's Trojans outweigh the Bears on the defensive line by an average of four pounds a man. The Longhorns are even bigger, averaging out to 290 apiece.
The difference in the offensive lines is even more staggering. The mean for the '85 Bears' front offensive five was 267 pounds; their 2005 USC and Texas counterparts average 312 pounds a man. Excuse us -- did we say the 1985 Bears? The offensive lines of this year's first- and second-ranked college teams outweigh that of the defending NFL champion New England Patriots by nine pounds a man.
And that's just the linemen. The quarterback for the '85 Bears was Jim McMahon, who was 6-1 and about 195. USC's Matt Leinart is 6-5, 225, while Texas QB Vince Young is 6-5 and 233. The quarterbacks in tonight's championship match average 229 pounds -- or a pound more than the linebackers for Chicago's 1985 champions.
It isn't just the size of modern college players. The level of coaching, training and competition in big-time college football has become so keen that many believe their top players can go right into the pros and immediately become starters or even stars. "You could take Southern Cal's and Texas' top players and put them into the pros right now," says a scout for an NFL draft Web site. Most scouts contend that as many as two-dozen players from the two teams will eventually be drafted into the pros, led by USC's 2004 Heisman Trophy winner Mr. Leinart, 2005 Heisman Trophy winner running back Reggie Bush, fullback LenDale White, wide receiver Dwayne Jarrett and strong safety Darnell Bing, as well as UT's Mr. Young, strong safety Michael Huff, and offensive tackles Jonathan Scott and Justin Blaylock.
Well, does that mean that Texas or Southern Cal could actually beat some pro teams? Pause. The scout replied, "I would favor either Texas or USC over at least the bottom third of the NFL."
ESPN has been broadcasting segments in which commentators compare the Trojans and Longhorns to great college champions of the past, but to many veteran sportswriters the comparisons are irrelevant. In an interview last year, longtime college-football writer Dan Jenkins said, "Comparing the best college teams of the past five or so years to legendary champions of the past is like comparing supersonic jet fighters to propeller-driven World War II planes. The game has really changed that quickly. Most of the players I see on top teams today look like they were manufactured in laboratories."
If so, the laboratories were designed by the NFL. Up until 1963, college football players were expected to play on both offense and defense, and the most important attribute for a football player was quickness and stamina, not sheer strength. As late as 1965, Bear Bryant's Alabama national championship team still averaged little more than 200 pounds a man. But as rules changed to allow unlimited substitution, specialization took precedence over versatility and, as players spent more and more time in the weight room, their size began to increase dramatically. This development was perfect for pro football, which no longer had to guess what a player's best position might be when he was drafted; by the time the player turned pro, he already had two or more years of experience at his particular position.
As college players evolved into prototypes of professionals, the game itself began to change until, by the 21st century, college football is scarcely distinguishable from the pro style. For instance, Texas' previous national championship contenders were almost all running teams; it was the Longhorns who first made the "Wishbone" famous by winning the title in 1969. The Wishbone quarterback usually had just a single wide receiver to throw to; his primary job was handing off or pitching the ball to one of three other runners in his backfield. In contrast, this year's Longhorns use pro-style formations that might feature no running backs and as many as five pass receivers.
The result is a college game that challenges and sometimes exceeds the pros for offensive fireworks -- often both Southern Cal and Texas score better than 50 points a game. But it's also a game where styles once peculiar to college football are vanishing. "You used to be able to tell the moment you turned on the TV," says Mr. Jenkins, "if you were watching Texas or Alabama with their Wishbone or Notre Dame with their Wingback-set or Southern Cal with their Tailback-I formation. Now, almost every team seems to be playing pro football." Maybe because they are."
----------
Heck, Txdad07, we have BASEBALL FIELDS bigger than Connecticut.