Skip to main content

found this on www.NCAA.org

The NCAA national office has received the 30 necessary override requests to require the Division I Board of Directors to review its August action to amend legislation regarding financial aid packages for baseball student-athletes. The Board next meets November 1 in Indianapolis.

It is the first time since the federated governance structure in 1997 that a legislative concept has been overridden twice. The original proposal, which was among four adopted from the Baseball Academic Enhancement Working Group in April, required individual financial aid packages for baseball student-athletes to include at least 33 percent athletics aid. After the first membership override, the Board decided to lower the percentage of required aid to individual players to 25 percent and to allow all countable aid – not just athletics aid – to be included in the calculation toward the minimum.

The Board kept some provisions in the original proposal, including the retention of the financial aid model of 11.7 equivalencies and the limiting of counters to 30 in 2008-09 and 27 in 2009-10 and thereafter and caps the regular-season squad-size limit at 35.

In requesting an override of the legislation, some member institutions said they believed the legislation encroached on institutional autonomy. Other institutions said the minimum aid requirement would be a disadvantage for both private institutions and institutions without the funds to offer aid to many recruits at that level. Additionally, some institutions believe that more time should pass to see if academic reform efforts are successful in baseball before additional changes are made.

However, the proposal is considered by many to be an important part of the larger baseball package approved by the Board in April, including a provision eliminating the one-time transfer rule for baseball student-athletes. That proposal required a commitment by the student-athlete to an institution, and the financial aid proposal would demonstrate a commitment by the institution to a student-athlete.

The Board has the following options at its November 1 meeting: (1) Accept the override, in which case the legislation would be rescinded; or (2) Take no additional action and permit the Division I delegates present and voting at the 2008 NCAA Convention in Nashville; or (3) Revise the proposal again, which would subject the legislation to a third override by at least 30 institutions that would delay final resolution of the issue until the 2009 Convention.

The legislation has an effective date of August 1, 2008.
Good, Better, Best, Never let it rest till the Good is Better and the Better is Best
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

They really need to simplify this whole process.

The smartest discussion I ever saw was to give 24 baseball players tuition only, and then all students have to pay room and board. Students would chose a school based on "the school" versus the "deal."

No plan will ever be perfect but it is a confusing process, much of which is very cut throat.
College baseball at the NCAA-I level is the second largest producer of revenue for NCAA championships behind men's college basketball. The football bowl game revenues are distributed within the conference of the bowl teams and not to the NCAA itself.

Supposedly Ron Polk has had a big impact in getting not just the necessary 30 but 56 override requests.

Ron Polk Interview With Scout.com On The Response To His Letter

Ron Polk's Letter To Everyone
Last edited by Tuzigoot
You are correct about bowl games but baseball championship dollars does not come close to any money generated from football and basketball regular season games. One Michigan football game would create more money than several years of Illinois baseball revenue. I understand UofI isnt a powerhouse in baseball.

When Ohio State won the National Title they had to share 17mil with Big Ten schools and of course that is apx 1.5 mil a school, still more than any BT baseball program made. Again I understand BT baseball is brutal but we live here and our schools wont treat them like football and basketball players with regards to scoly dollars.

BTW Texas football reported 58 mil in revenue and 37 mil in profit last year. Unbelievable.
TNHN,

What mandates would you be talking about? I'm wondering if women's crew or fencing might meet those mandates?
I understand that in many cases, not all, as Been has reminded us, baseball programs don't bring in a lot of revenue. That still doesn't hold much water with me. When a football team's 3rd string TE who might not ever see the field or the 13th man on the basketball team gets a full ride and the baseball team has 11.7 scholly's available for 30 plus guys? That to me is discrimination. Why are we discriminating against baseball players? Because they didn't grow up to be basketball or football players? I didn't even talk about the women's sports who might have even less revenue than baseball and their players might be on full scholarship as well. Don't hold me to that, on the womens teams having full scholly players because I don't know, haven't researched it and don't have the time. Maybe another member knows?

I just think it is rotten that baseball players get the shaft because of the sport they play. This is America's game for crying out loud, take care of the kids.
And while they're at it they should make these college teams use wooden bats. Would make the CWS more enjoyable to watch in June!
I agree with you 100%. I am just trying to think of the reasons why it is the way it is. And the mandates, yes you caught on.

Alot of conf going to wood bat, wont be long everyone will be wood bat - the way it should be. We are playing this weekend at St. Louis University and the director just told me that the tournament is now regular bat and not wood bat????? it is October 13th??? supposed to be fall baseball which to most people means wood bats.
Thank you Bill and Tuzigoot and others for bringing this to our attention. The Polk interview/letter was both enlightening and frightening.
Wondering what we peons could possibly do to help?
Perhaps someone could consider organizing letter writing/phone calls to their area university presidents?
This website with it's nationwide reach could serve as a springboard.
thanks again and please keep us updated.

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×