Originally I had David Wright but after today I think I have to go to Jimmie Rollins or Holliday from Colorado. What are the opinions out there?
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:He outhit Rollins in every category there is.
He had three more than Rollins. Did Holliday become the fourth 20/20/20/20 in baseball history? Oh! That was Rollins!quote:Originally posted by Dear old Dad:
Holliday even led the Major Leagues in extra base hits - with 91. That is far more than any other player in the NL and one of the all-time best ever in the NL.
The MVP is an award for the season. Please feel free to give Holliday the September Player of the Month award.quote:Originally posted by Dear old Dad:
Even the stats from the month of September support Holliday.
What a bunch of whooey. Rollins has been a Gold Glove quality shortstop flying under the radar screen for years. He's scored 500 runs in the past four years. He had 789 hits in the past four years. He's always been a stud shortstop with a gun. By the way, ESPN is owned by Disney. Are you telling me a California based corporation has an east coast bias?quote:Originally posted by Dear old Dad:
ESPN has been pushing Rollins relentlessly. At least in the NY area. I don't know how regionalized ESPN is in their programming.
It's easier to hit for average and power at Coors field than in my backyard. While the ball carries well at CBP, it's nothing like Coors.quote:Originally posted by Dear old Dad:
Logically and statistically, Holliday is the man this year. Hopefully the writers will do the right thing.
quote:Originally posted by luvbb:
TG..don't forget stolen bases (41) and runs scored (139) in the equation.
What impresses me about Rollins is that he accomplished only three less extra base hits than Holliday did...from the lead off position. And that includes 94 RBIs from batting lead off too.
quote:A leadoff guy will score more runs. A middle of the order guy will have more rbi's. These stats can be misleading. Where the hitter is placed in the order has significance.
While I'm in no way implying Rollins is a Hall of Fame player, he just led his team putting up similar stats to a Hall of Fame middle infielder, Joe Morgan.quote:Originally posted by luvbb:quote:A leadoff guy will score more runs. A middle of the order guy will have more rbi's. These stats can be misleading. Where the hitter is placed in the order has significance.
I also agree that Rollins has done better in Hollidays forte' than Holliday has done in Rollins.
I think "history" is what Rollins has going againist him in the NL MVP votes....I think there has only ever been one other lead-off hitter who won NL MVP....Pete Rose. And shortstop? I think the NL MVP has only gone to a shortstop six times in it's 75 years of existance...last being Barry Larkin...before that Maury Wills in the early 60's.
IF Rollins should be awarded the NL MVP..he'd certainly be breaking some molds.
Too many good stats from players still in the dance.quote:Originally posted by rz1:
No Midwest luv on this site I see. The Prince from Milw deserves some consideration.
I will admit to hearing the answer on the radio this week. It's Kevin Mitchell. But he had some big numbers. Terry Pendleton and Kirk Gibson won MVP's with numbers that would make you yawn even though they hit .300. Until I reread your question I was ready to slap Dennis Eckersley on you as the answer for below .300.quote:Originally posted by PGStaff:
Here is a question... How many times and when was the last time a player (not a pitcher) been named league MVP when he did not hit .300 or better for that year?