I often find myself wondering about the underlying policy of "no cut." Is it so that no one should have their feelings hurt? Is it that limited sports budgets should be spread out equally to the entire student body? (My son's high school now has pay to play btw). It seems a slippery slope to me that is not based in the way life actually works. Here are some questions I have:
1) Should we have no cut cheerleading?
2) No cut drama, music auditions or art exhibits? For example, if someone wants to act, sing or display some artwork, should that student be allowed to do so?
3) No cut student government?
4) Should all students who want to attend Harvard, Yale, Stanford, etc. be allowed to do so - regardless of the underlying merits.
5) Should we even bother keeping score at the games?
6) In the interest of fairness, safety, and promotion of physical fitness, do not intramural sports and physical education classes meet these needs?
7) On the other hand, if the kid is willing to pay to participate and understands the playing guidelines, what does it hurt to give them a uniform and let them dress for games