I have some questions about academic colleges that don't offer scholarships.
My CA son (2010) is very focused on his academics and is looking only at schools that offer strong engineering and science programs. He wants to stay in CA and he wants to go to the best college his grades will get him in to. I'm guessing his GPA will be around 4.0 or higher (AP classes), but not high enough to get an academic scholarship to the top private schools like CIT, Harvey Mudd, or Stanford. We couldn't afford those schools without financial help, so we are putting our efforts to the top UC's like UCLA, UCSB, UCSD, UC Berkeley, and CalPoly-SLO.
His baseball skills are very well rounded, but not eye-popping in any one area, and he is still growing and filling out. The scouts I've seen at the events he has attended seem to really focus on pitching and power hitting (and the players that already look like men), so he seems to be flying under the radar a little. The word from the scouts, coaches, and camp evaluators is that his skills suggest he "could" develop into a D1 player, and "should" be able to play DII or below.
The two schools that he recieved personal responses from are UCSD and UCSB. Both are non-scholarship (athletic) schools. So here are the questions I would have:
1. Do these type of schools recruit with the same timeline as scholarship schools. It would seem that they wouldn't get early commitments.
2. Do these schools that don't commit to scholarship players have a history of high turnover? It would seem that they wouldn't be very committed to players if they aren't financially obligated.
3. I've researched the past postings, but there is nothing recent about these schools (UCSD, UCSB) and there current programs. Does anyone have inside info on these programs about the recruiting, coaching, or treatment of the players? I know UCSD has a new recruiting coordinator (Hobbs) since anyone has posted here about UCSD. UCSB contacts seem to be mostly from Tom Myers.
Original Post