Originally Posted by Twoson:
...
It is just interesting that his HS coach clearly sees more value in defense at 1B than at the corner outfield spots. He will put much slower guys in the OF spots and keep my faster son at 1B.
It makes some sense to me in that 1B likely has multiple plays a game where defense matters (either in bounced throws, quick throws to other bases, fielding grounders). My son gets to little foul pops in front of the 1B dugout or down the RF line that other 1Bs wouldn't get to.
A right-fielder my only have 1 or 2 plays a game where speed matters.
Just trying to challenge the conventional wisdom . . .
The difference is what is typical at the college level vs HS level. Everyone on the college roster is a very good baseball player and can likely perform sufficiently well if moved to 1b. Not the case in HS ball. You nailed it. Touches are high, so the position is quite important at the youth levels when not everyone can field or catch adequately but this diminishes as more proficient players become part of a team's makeup.
So, to answer your original question, it is the right direction to work on getting the 60 time down a bit, the velo up a few ticks, and work on both options defensively. But mostly, continue to evolve as a hitter and showcase as an OF. This will give him multiple position options (two or three OF spots and 1b) instead of just one.