Skip to main content

Question from a JV game last night.  My son is playing first base, and there is a pop up right along the first base line.  He has his hands up and is settling under the ball.  He is right along the base line, and the runner is going hard down the line with his head down and just flattens my son who never saw him coming.  Kind of like a punt receiver in football, and my son took the helmet right in the chest.  The umpire did not call the batter out.  According to my son, who was shaken up but ended up staying in the game, his reasoning was that the ball would have been foul, and the contact was not intentional.  It seems that it was not at all obvious whether the ball would have been fair or foul, which is the reason the contact occured on the baseline.  Was this the right call?

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Well, this was what my son related of the umpire's explanation.  My first question is whether "intent" matters to whether he should have been out, or is he out simply because he interfered with the fielder's ability to catch the ball.  My second question, now that I have looked into this a little, is whether the batter should have been ejected for malicious contact, if he made no effort to avoid the collision.   

8-4-2:  "A runner is out when he:  . . . g. intentionally interferes with a throw or thrown ball; or he hinders a fielder in his initial attempt to field a batted ball."

 

Intention doesn't matter when a runner hinders a fielder in his initial attempt to field a batted ball. 

 

Whether the ball is fair or foul matters when a runner is contacted by a batted ball, but it isn't relevant when a runner hinders a fielder making his initial attempt to field it.  

 

If the batter runner gets hit by the batted ball while running in foul territory, it's just a foul ball.  But when he runs into the fielder attempting to field it, it is interference regardless of whether the ball is fair or foul. 

 

I have interference on this play.  Ball is dead.  Batter runner is out.  Any other runners return to their previous bases.  Same ruling whether ball is fair or foul.  If I thought the runner knew he was running through the fielder (and my presumption would be a guy running in a straight line knows what's in front of him), it would be malicious contact, and the batter runner would be ejected. 

NFHS rule 8-4-2-g  "A Runner is out when...he hinders a fielder on his attempt to field a batted ball"  (no mention to fair or foul).

8-4-2-e  "A Runner is out when...he initiates malicious contact"

3-3-1-n  " ... Player.. shall not... initiate malicious contact on offense or defense...Penalty: The umpire shal eject the offender from the game..."

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×