This was before they imposed the mandatory 25% with limits.
Many players before the rule, were lucky to get even 15%. So there was more flexibility.
It was tough then and tougher now to get full baseball money, so I really don't believe it when someone says "75%" athletic or in amounts greater that lets say 60%. I think JH explained it well.
My son was given that option to lure him out of FL and to go to college. It made it affordable for us to travel to see him as well. However, the coach that recruited him did so for a year, and also had scouts watch him on a regular basis. Son was a RHP throwing over 90 at the time. Pitching got most of the baseball money, even the top position guys didn't get as much, and I don't think they do now. People stretched the truth 10 years ago and they do now. I know I may be an old
timer but some things never change.
Keep in mind that before they changed to the minimum 25% academic money was still available. In the state son went to, he told me that many on the team from that state were given state funded (lottery) money and the coach threw in the books. If you all think it was better than now you are wrong. Most players got nothing while others got a lot. Any player living in states that have those programs and able to qualify for free tuition and given an offer is not, IMO, getting full athletic dollars but blended. My son's option to go to UF included that option, bright futures from FL.
As far as giving 90 and not 100, I think that the % left we covered were meals, and many will tell you that meals is the last thing that is paid for by any programs. I am not sure this is JMO. Most people tell me that that is the one thing they have to be responsible for regardless of JUCO, NAIA, D1,D2.
The 90 was a great oppportunity, keep in mind after the first year and players move out of the dorm expenses move up.
You make a great point about programs not being budgeted (fully funded). I don't believe that most programs have the luxury of giving large athletic dollars out these days. This is why the blending and creative recruiting has become the norm.
Funny times we live in, most of us never really discussed what our sons got and when people asked we would say, "nice" or enough to leave.
But since he did ask (has anyone's son received great offers from outstanding programs and felt they might not be deserving) I decided that I would answer.
What I really did question (at the time) was the guy who offered him 35% without ever seeing him play(SEC). He claimed he had promised a large chunk to an outfielder.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed7eb/ed7ebaedb37d97711f1f6b80233fa78a917ac73d" alt=""
Needless to say that coach didn't do well and not sure he is coaching anywhere.