Skip to main content

This is a hypothetical question.

It can be applied to a high school or college situation. Pick whatever scenario that you want to use.

Working under the assumption that championship teams have a brotherhood and a unique chemistry that's required, can just one player on a roster who is universally disliked by everyone on the team disrupt and/or adversely  impact that team chemistry and derail the team's goal for the season?

In terms of professional teams, there seems to be enough evidence to say no. Plenty of teams have won championships with a guy on the roster who was a pariah. But, what about high school and/or college teams?

Does it make a difference if the hated player is a star player? Is it then more tolerable and it's only an issue if the player isn't special? Is it easier if the player in question is a pitcher or position player?

Last edited by Francis7
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

My son’s high school team had a jackass on the roster. No one liked him. Junior and senior year this kid thought he was the best player on the team. He wasn’t afraid to tell everyone on the team. He especially had a burr up his butt about my son. He had been playing second fiddle to him since LL all stars.

He was good. He hit .400 senior year after going 4-4 in the last game. He had a gun for an arm in right and ran a 6.6 sixty. He made all conference for the first time senior year.  

The kids on the team shunned him. They didn’t talk to him. The kid stood by himself in the dugout. He tried to make friends with the new players called up from JV. But they had heard about him. My son told me about an in your face calling out the head coach had with him during a on offseason workout session.

The kid didn’t hurt team chemistry. He was ignored. Both years he was in varsity they won the conference and went well into districts in a very large 6A classification district. They got at large state seeds both years.

The kid went mid major CAA. My son had a friend playing in the same program. He was told the “teammate” got into it with one of the assistants in the fall. He was told his baseball services would no longer be needed.

The kid stayed at the school. Last I knew he got his PhD and is a professor there. One of the kid’s problems was he was smarter than most people and didn’t respect them. He didn’t know when to shut up.

I had the kid on my 13u team. Most of the team approached me and requested I not have the kid back for 14u. They were tired of hearing from the kid how much better he was than everyone else.

I coached the kid through two years of LL and 13u. I had already decided I had enough. He wasn’t invited back.

Add: After junior year the high school head coach asked me if I had any problems coaching the kid. I responded the kid was now three years older so any comment wouldn’t be applicable.

Last edited by RJM

I am going to take a different take on this OP.  I was an AC on a very good HS team that we knew could contend for a state championship.  We had a move-in from a bad school/area.  It was obvious to see all of the defense mechanisms displayed by this kid.  In short, he was hard to like.  More than once the HC got after him because he did things that were not acceptable in the program.  However, slowly a change happened and it happened because the players decided to bring him along and accept him.  The coaches accepted him but none of us lowered our expectations.  Personally, I did my best to work with him.  He was very talented.  One of my proudest moments for any team that I coached was when we won a state title and while receiving the championship medal he fell to his knees crying.  Teammates circled around him and helped lift him back up.  That young man went on to have an exceptional college career and did well professionally as well. 

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×