Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Agreed, and just in time for the Summer events and Showcases! Much more appealing visually.

And I really like how PG includes the age of the player below the graduating class year.  I am seeing huge disparities in age.  My son will graduate next June as a 17-year old senior while there are sophomores now he is playing against who are already 17. It would seem player age might be a big indicator for coaches considering physical size and metrics that may have room for an increase for the younger kids versus the older ones.  But I don't see any other sites that include age.

Backstop22 posted:

Agreed, and just in time for the Summer events and Showcases! Much more appealing visually.

And I really like how PG includes the age of the player below the graduating class year.  I am seeing huge disparities in age.  My son will graduate next June as a 17-year old senior while there are sophomores now he is playing against who are already 17. It would seem player age might be a big indicator for coaches considering physical size and metrics that may have room for an increase for the younger kids versus the older ones.  But I don't see any other sites that include age.

  Age won't matter much to college coaches because they just want to win no matter how old you are. MLB scouts love the young-ens it gives them more to dream on 3-5 years down the road.

I think the biggest change is the graph that shows when they were scored, how they compared to their age group at that time, and how a class rates during a particular year.  It looks like it will account for the problem where a player's early scores (i.e., 75mph as freshman) are included with his class's average later on (i.e., at graduation year).   

I like the format but some of the percentile rankings don't appear to be correct - Random 2016 RHP - FB 84, Avg 2016 84 Rank 37.6%; 60 - 7.29 Avg 2016 7.26 Rank 56.63%; Bat Speed 83.2 Avg 2016 79 Rank 64.38%   The 60 time seems like it should be below 50% while the FB speed should be closer to 50% as it is the average correct?  The Bat speed makes sense but on several players, especially pitching numbers, the percentile seems backwards.  Am I missing something?

FriarFred,

We have noticed some issues with the percentiles and our IT staff is working on that.  I noticed one player has a 6.9 60 listed at the 30 something percentile.  I don't think 70% of the players we see run better than 6.9.

I would imagine we will find a few more glitches as everything is pulled from the datbase.  It is very helpful when people bring these things to our attention.

Really like:

-All PG showcase grades have been combined into a graph, that's just cool!

-The logo for the college they have committed to

-LOVE LOVE LOVE that it doesn't take 5 minutes to load a players 40 events, that usually crashed my system before.

one teeny tiny suggestion, I miss the All Tournament team banners being bright red.  By keeping them the same color as much of the page it doesn't stand out as much, and that is an accomplishment that SHOULD stand out.

 

FriarFred posted:

I like the format but some of the percentile rankings don't appear to be correct - Random 2016 RHP - FB 84, Avg 2016 84 Rank 37.6%; 60 - 7.29 Avg 2016 7.26 Rank 56.63%; Bat Speed 83.2 Avg 2016 79 Rank 64.38%   The 60 time seems like it should be below 50% while the FB speed should be closer to 50% as it is the average correct?  The Bat speed makes sense but on several players, especially pitching numbers, the percentile seems backwards.  Am I missing something?

I think this is an issue of using both mean and median as a way of measuring players against their respective class. 

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×