Some may not like what i am about to say but I certainly hope what has been said so far is not received by the up and coming Little League coach who is reading this thread as the only point of view on this site.
First, i too have coached for many, many years at all youth age group levels [and slow pitch softball at adult levels, for what it is worth]. There are "the right attitudes" and "the wrong attitudes" as far as coaching at the Little League level [ages 5 to 12] is concerned as I see it at the ripe old age of 60.
To begin with, if winning is the only thing that is important to the coach or even the way by which to measure a coach's 'success', then that is 'the wrong attitude'. If, on the other hand, teaching baseball fundamentals of fielding, hitting, throwing and running are what is primary in the mind of the coach and 'success' is measured by the degree to which EVERY SINGLE PLAYER ON THAT TEAM was able to improve his baseball skills in fielding, hitting, throwing and running thereby improving his chances to succeed at the next level, then that is 'the right attitude.'
For purposes of illustration, let us open for discussion only one example from the above discussion. The bunt. The sacrifice bunt is often used by some MLB teams in specific situations [e.g. runners on first and second and no outs] and is used by most National League Teams when the pitcher is at the plate and anyone is on base anywhere. Super speedy lead-off batters that have trouble hitting the baseball out of the infield sometimes try to drag-bunt to get one base.
At the College and High School level the bunt is used more often to advance a runner on any base, for a speedy runner to get on first [dragbunt], and as a squeeze play. Other than the sacrifice to advance a runner, at these levels the bunt is promarily used as a surprise tactic.
At the Little League level I have seen the bunt occassionally abused by some coaches. By abused, I mean the following scenario. First batter up, bunts; second up, bunts; third up, bunts; fourth batter hits, if, after his at bat there is no force at home, fifth up bunts, etc., ad infinitum. I have heard this tactic justified by coaches using the following reasoning: "If you can't stop it I am going to keep doing it", "If you would work on bunt coverage more like we do, this would not happen", and, of course, the ultimate bone crunching logic of "We win this way."
OK. Let us take the Little League I am familar with here in West Virginia for our example. Each team will play between 18 and 24 games a year. Assuming 3 to 4 at bats per 6 inning game [let us work with 3.5], that is between 63 and 84 at bats against live peer pitching for that entire year. If you signal a batter to bunt at least once in every game, that batter is, by your 'strategic decision', now limited to between 45 and 60 total at bats for the summer where he can attempt to hit live peer pitching in a real game situation. And if you have the same batter bunt twice in every game, you are now down to between 27 and 36 total at bats for the summer. Then let us further assume that this child is "lucky enough" to have such a coach for 4 years {ages 9 through 12] as is the case in most Little League programs. If so, at the end of his 4 years, for the child at the plate that has averaged one bunt per game for his career, it could be argued that between 63 and 84 at bats where the bater is given the opportunity to actually practice hitting a baseball against live per pitching in a real game situation have been denied him. But, of course, at the end of that time and for what it is worth, he will know how to bunt. The question really is, is he as prepared as he should be to hit at the next level?
By and large I have found Little League Administrators to be "good eggs" and have not found them to be "outnumbered" by "folks who like to make up scores of stupid rules just to prove to you that they can." I have, however, found most [but certainly not all] coaches I have encountered at the Little League level to have their mind focused on things other than teaching every player that they either inherit or draft the fundametals of baseball in a way that will best prepare them to play this wonderful game at the next level.
But, after all, maybe those type of coaches are limited to West Virginia.
TW344