This site is a remarkable resource for top HS players looking for direction with their recruiting efforts. Great advice on timelines, choosing schools, showcases, camps, deciphering offers, athletic and academic scholarship info, official visit advice, communication with coaches and on and on. But I often wonder if there isn't a bit of disconnect here with the majority of kids who are capable of filling the “bottom half” of college rosters.
Sometimes we talk about there being a place for just about anyone who works hard enough and has a plan. And, yes, there may be a tech school in Oregon that may be a fit for an academic kid in New Mexico. There may be a D3 in Nebraska that would be a great athletic fit for a kid from a middle class home in Georgia. But, realistically, will those kids be able to make the necessary school visits to determine reasonable fit? Will the middle class kid be blocked from his athletic fit due to financial limitations? The top players will stand out at the big showcases but what about the those solid players who don't really stand out in that arena? We advise to choose a good mix of the right camps, showcases and travel teams but what about the many who don't have the financial means? We define the “correct” recruiting timeline but what about the many players who don't know they may be good enough until they have a good senior year? or don't figure out which sport they have a better shot at until then? We suggest that HS players can find a match if they cast a wide enough net but is that realistic? Can most afford out-of-state or private school tuition? Can they adjust to culture change? How will they get in front of that coach five states over? Will a coach really bring on a grinder based on a video clip?
We talk a lot about going where you are loved. Yet, I think many grinders end up contributing at the college level without ever really getting love on the recruiting trail.
I imagine most of us know more of this type of player than those getting multiple offers. I wonder how many lurkers fit this profile? Plenty, I suspect. I know that much of the advice and information here applies to all recruits but how do we do a better job at helping this group?
* Clarification - "bottom half of college rosters" is a generalization. I am aware that the majority of D1 players as well as many of the better players across other divisions are heavily recruited. This is about the rest.