Recent threads about Senators, chewing tobacco, Nyger Morgan, etc. got me thinking.
Are athletes role models? Should they be? Can there be both good and bad role models?
I do think athletes can be role models. As can senators, teachers, businessmen, janitors, coaches, ministers, relatives, neighbors, etc.
Everyone around us has the opportunity to be a role model. Yet, clearly not everyone can be a good one. And that is up to each one of us who we choose to look up to.
When an athlete misbehaves (or worse, chews tobacco), people cry out that the athlete is not living up to his role model status. Well, I don't think the athlete title automatically makes you a role model.
Does the public-nature of a person's occupation automatically require them to be a role model? I can name ministers, politicians, actors, musicians and many other high-profile people who I would put at the absolute bottom of the role model list.
Heck, I can name two of my relatives who would be at complete opposite ends of the role model spectrum. Just because we're related doesn't mean squat.
It took me a number of years to realize I was raised the right way. I'd like to think that I'm doing the same for my boys...and that they'll recognize it sooner!
They know the difference between Cal Ripken Jr. and Nyger Morgan, between Herr Suppan (our local German teacher) and Mary Kay Letourneau, between Uncle Mike (boo!) and Grandpa Schultz (yay!!!!)
The title, Athlete, does not necessarily equal Role Model.
Original Post