OK, bear with me. This is just a post to make you say HHMMmmmmmmmmm?? Not trying to offend or create drama, or take away from some great hitting instructors and/or their top selling DVD's, just ponder this....
I read a comment in an earlier thread that the rotational swing, and Albert Pujols was the example, centered on rotation around the rear hip. Some were for, some were against that opinion. The good news is you were all correct, but the bad news is MAYBE you are all ALSO wrong.
If we stick with the Pujols example, specifically video of his pro swing where his rear foot is entirely off the ground at contact, I offer this dissenting opinion.
First a definition and an absolute. The very definition of a rotational movement centers around spinning or turning, at a variable 90 degree plane. OK - that's cool for a 1 dimensional object. But, the human body is 3 dimensional. So, a rotational movement around a 3 dimensional object REQUIRES the rotation to occur around an AXIS. This axis MUST bear the weight of the object that is rotating, that is the absolute for a 3 dimensional object.
So, that being said, if Albert's rear foot is off the ground at contact which occurs AFTER 100% weight shift to the front side the axis must be centered around the FRONT HIP, as the front foot is the only part of the 3 dimensional object that is in contact with the ground. This maintains the weight bearing axis and allows for the rotation of the upper body.
But, I've also seen many rotational hitters with their rear foot in contact with the ground, bearing the weight of the rotating object. I've even seen video examples of Pujols hitting with his rear foot on the ground. So, total weight shift is not 100%, therefore the the axis for rotation is the rear hip. Furthermore, maybe it is not the hip(s) that matter, but the body's core that carries the inertia created by the rotation.
Did I say there were absolutes that apply in my example? Only in the laws of physics. Quite honestly, I have another opinion that there are actually two rotations occuring. The object rotation - the body, and an orbital rotation - the BAT! Which is another physics lesson entirely.
Maybe it's just safer to say the best swing is magical. Because.... we recognize it when we see it, but we can't really explain it.
I'm out - PEACE... GED10DaD
Original Post