I realize, or accept, all of those things. I also realize that there are plenty of idiot PT's out there. I wouldn't bother with one who was not experienced in rehabing specific sports injuries.
And I am sure YOU realize that there are "certified" AT's out there who are little more than ankle tapers. That's what we dealt with when son was in HS.
Son's college AT is very good and I have no doubt competent to administer rehab.
The purpose of my post was not to start a debate of PT's vs. AT's, but to emphasize that the school controls the rehab, not the kid. That's a reality, but it still bothers me. I suppose I'm just paranoid. If the school doctor says surgery, I'm going to get a second INDEPENDENT opinion. And if son needed PT I would RATHER it be from an experienced INDEPENDENT PT rather than a wet behind the ears trainer. But hey, that's just me being paranoid. And AGAIN, my point was that if you have a kid in that situation the school is probably going to control who he sees, and that's probably going to be a trainer. My apologies if I offended.
quote:
Originally posted by Bulldog 19:
quote:
I think we're on the same page. Personally, I would rather have a PT trained in sports injuries ahead of most trainers.
You do realize that in order to be a Sports Medicine Specialist as a PT you have to have additional training as a first responder, EMT, or most often as an athletic trainer?
And you also realize that in many states a PT also works in conjunction with a physician just like an athletic trainer would?
And you also realize that most PTs although they claim to offer "sports therapy" have no background in sports rehab?
That said, I would put my throwers in the hands of an experienced certified athletic trainer over an experience physical therapist. Athletic Trainers are trained specifically for return to athletics. PTs are trained for return to daily living.