Seeing that Perfect Game holds more Underclass Showcases than anyone, thought I would give my perspective.
We started doing Underclass events several years ago. The main purpose was to scout younger players. After all we were responsible for ranking them in Baseball America.
We didn’t think it would be a big deal or get a ton of interest. Since then we have had thousands of underclassmen attend these events including many who ended up being first round draft picks and/or college All Americans.
Also our best showcase for rising seniors each year is held earlier (in June) than all others. We want to know who the best players are before they are juniors or seniors. Otherwise we would be inviting the wrong players to our National. Anyone who cares to look at the players who have participated in past PG Nationals will see the talent level.
A large number of these players were found at PG Underclass Showcases. By the way (it can be checked) most all PG National Players are then invited to East Coast Pro or Area Codes held later in the summer. Truth is, it all started for many of them at Underclass events.
We knew scouts and college recruiters were always going to be most interested in the current class. They would spend their money covering the current class. In the meantime our goal was to start a file on young players. This way these players would have a history. We could monitor progress and watch players develop.
I talked to Dan Jennings (Florida Marlins VP) who was then the Scouting Director for the D’Rays. I told him about these underclass events. He said “Jerry, why would a scouting department or college recruiter even care about sophomores and freshman?”
I was ready for this question and had an example prepared. Here is how the conversation went. Fairly close to the exact words!
“Dan, when you draft a player and consider paying him $2,000,000 don’t you want to know as much as possible about that player? He answered “Of course” but what’s that have to do with a sophomore or freshman in high school?
What if you were deciding between two identical pitchers, both very good, both 6-2/185, both with 92 mph fastballs. Now you look at these two over the last 4 years.
You noticed that pitcher “A” was throwing 88 mph as a 6-1/175 9th grader and pitcher “B” was throwing 78 mph as a 5-8/145 9th grader.
Then you see that pitcher “A” was throwing 90 mph as a 6-2/180 Soph. and Pitcher “B” was throwing 83 mph as a 5-10/160 Soph.
Then you see that Pitcher “A” as a Junior was throwing 92 mph and was 6-2/180 and Pitcher “B” was throwing 88 mph and was 6-0/175.
Now it’s the draft eligible year and they’re both 6-2/185 and both throwing 92. Which one would you project to be better NEXT YEAR? Which one is more likely to grow some more? Is the history of these players very important.
He said, Jerry you’re really on to something here!
Chris Lubanski, Lastings Milledge, Delmon Young, Jarrod Saltalamacchia, Ryan Sweeney, BJ Upton, Zach Greinke, Prince Fielder, Jay Rainville, Justin Upton, Jeff Clement, Andrew McCutchen, and many, many more were all players who attended PG Underclass Events. I could mention hundreds of high draft picks and college stars. All had a long history with lots of information. This info would often show year by year improvement. This improvement would give clues regarding work ethic and dedication among other things. Not only could a player’s progress be followed, but valuable clues regarding that all important “make up”! Most importantly, it would give added data to the projection issue.
Please understand!.... I am not saying that the underclassmen events were the reason for these players success. However, the Underclassmen Showcases were the first time we saw them play and it was the first of many reports we had on them. Here is a link that could shed some light on the subject.
Chris LubanskiAt the risk of sounding like PG is extra special, may I say this? If we (PG) see a good underclassmen prospect… The entire scouting world will soon know this player. One could say… that is as good of exposure as an underclassmen can get!
TPM,
Just this week a recruiting coordinator at a top DI college (one you are extremely familiar with and very close to) called with a request.
He wanted a contact list of who we thought were top 2007 and 2008 high school players. He does not attend underclass showcases. Of course, I was able to provide that list because we do so many underclassmen showcases among other things.
Most every player on that very long list of 07s and 08s had attended a PG underclass showcase. A couple hundred of them are now part of this recruiters follow list.
TPM, I believe you, above all others, would say “this” college’s follow list is a great one to be on, despite the fact the recruiter never attended the events.
Another point, we try to help USA Baseball as much as possible. We discuss top players for their Youth and Junior National teams. There have been many players we first saw at our Underclass Events who were then invited to Junior Olympics or Joplin because of their ability. There is no way of knowing how many would have been Team USA players had they not attended a PG Underclass Showcase. I imagine some would – some wouldn’t have.
Bottom line: I would like to think a player being seen by people on our staff can be very beneficial. Is it better to be seen by 10 college coaches and no one else know your name or would it be better to be seen by a creditable source who will tell nearly everyone about you? If we see a good player, everyone in baseball will know who he is.
Please, don’t anyone think this is any type of marketing ploy. I could care less what young players and parents decide. We sure don’t hold it against anyone who does not wish to attend underclass or any PG events. Everyone should make their own decision as to the value of such events. I just think people should know as many facts as possible and sometimes that goes much further than someone’s opinion.
Sorry for the length. It’s kind of hard to explain it in few words.