Skip to main content

My son's experience with Showball Showcase 2011 LA was great! Great Coach interaction & instruction. Many coaches from creditable programs present. Several coaches expressed interest after evaluation was given. Summer before Sophomore year. Signed up for same  event for 2012. Son was unable to attend due to issues with travel team conflict. SB would not refund money, understandable I guess.

PG runs a fine showcase program, son attended two.


I would recommend both, but for different reasons. PG Showcase is a must to get rated by a third authorized party and gives the exposure you are looking for. PG tourney's give you scout & RC exposure as they draw many.

SB gives you the opportunity to be seen by mostly local schools. My son was contacted by 30% of the coaches that attended the showcase and the conversation continued until the narrowing down process  played out.

I would say to attend the these early for exposure but then focus camps at schools that you are interested in and ones that are interested in you.  

Originally Posted by Newcomer:
Welcome to the website, SF Giant Dad! We'll keep a seat warm for you at PacBell (I can't call it by any other name, sorry). And it's sure a lot warmer than Candlestick ever was.

Your post got me thinking. I've noticed from recent posts elsewhere on this site about showcases that player evaluations are expected...and then not received. I don't recall any camps or showcases that my son attended(except the Stanford Camp)offering or giving specific feedback. The one exception was the University of San Francisco camp in which the coaches said you could come right up to them at the end of camp and get verbal feedback. As it turns out, my son didn't go to very many showcases or camps, so that might be the answer for me, at any rate. But what is the general consensus about evaluations? Do most showcases offer them? And what kind of quality should one expect?

I know this is old, but a client of mine went to an invite-only camp at Gonzaga. He was provided with a relatively detailed sheet of evaluations of his pitching - velocities, their subjective judgments about the quality of his pitching, etc. They offered him a walk-on guaranteed spot and eventually called him back and offered him a substantial amount of scholarship money. He chose elsewhere, but he was very pleased with how the Zags handled business.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×