Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

While both of you believe the high strike call should be called more frequently, I disagree. As I look at the situation with a more educated point of view, you should realize that with the increased rates of gravity, it puts greater strain on the ball as it lands in the strike zone. The only way the gravational pull can return to its normal state is if the global temperature drops to its normal degree. Good Day.
quote:
While both of you believe the high strike call should be called more frequently, I disagree. As I look at the situation with a more educated point of view, you should realize that with the increased rates of gravity, it puts greater strain on the ball as it lands in the strike zone. The only way the gravational pull can return to its normal state is if the global temperature drops to its normal degree. Good Day.

Jeez, I thought that was kinda funny. Am I missing something?
I thought both comments were kind of funny.

Maybe Milkie's explanation can be used to explain why so many quarterbacks are passing for 4000 yards today. Maybe it involves the heating of the ball increasing it's variable trajectory leading to increased distances on Payton Manning's throws.

And I already know my brain is full of noodles. It just happens to be linguini with clam sauce.

Back to the topic. I just think it would be nice to call what is officially outlined a strike. I have seen pitches at the belt called a ball for being too high. Some umpires will call off the plate, some won't. I know a lot of it is judgement, but when the "high strike" is not called as consistently as it is, it is really the umpires changing the strike zone on their own.

In the article it stated that the top of the strike zone is officially "in 1988, the upper limit became the “horizontal line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of the uniform pants.” How many times do you see a pitch in that zone called a strike. Almost never.

And, I often wonder if they construct those strke zone graphics according to the above actual strike zone or the unofficial - what the umpires are calling - strike zone. Personally, I think the batter definetely has the advantage because the strike zone is so small at the ML level. I sit there sometimes and wonder how pitchers can even compete when they almost have to throw it down the middle of the plate to get a called strike.

But then again, I'm a pitcher's dad so I may be a little biased.
quote:
Originally posted by piaa_ump:
quote:
Originally posted by bballman:
But then again, I'm a pitcher's dad so I may be a little biased.


nah...couldnt be.... Big Grin,


Wink

And you'll never hear me complain about the below the knees just off the plate pitch being called on anyone!! Including my son when he is batting. If he gets it called on him, I'll just ask him - Wouldn't you want it called a strike if you were pitching? It's always a yes.

Yeah, I'm biased.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×