Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Thanks for posting. Here is an interesting part of the article:

quote:
Take a look at Virginia (9-2), for example. The Cavaliers have their middle infield of the future in freshman SS Stephen Bruno and Reed Gragnani. Bruno is a very impressive 5-for-6 (.833) in early action with a home run and 7 RBIs. Gragnani is 5-for-12 (.417) with 6 RBIs. Neither is going to see his name written on Coach Brian O’Connor’s lineup card much this spring, though, with senior SS Tyler Cannon and junior 2B Phil Gosselin having started a combined 282 college games between them.


That's the typical situation at 4-year programs, where younger guys with a lot of talent oftentimes have to bide their time until the older talented guys graduate. There are always exceptions, as noted in the article, but recruits should not be surprised if they have to "pay their dues" for a year or two before getting significant playing time.
Every year is a new adventure in earning your spot in college. Coaches want to win and if a freshman is hitting, chances are he'll be in the line-up. A prospect could probably figure this out by reading previous rosters/stats for the college they're looking at. It seems to me from my limited exposure to college bb that some coaches use their older players more. Don't know if this really indicates a pattern or if it's just where the talent is.

Bottom line- you have to out work and out play a competitor for your position. I still chuckle silently when parents of younger recruits say they were told by the college coach that their player will start as a frosh. Maybe, maybe not- you gotta earn it.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×