quote:
Have some questions regarding SS versus 2B. Assuming players all have good arms, what makes a player a SS or 2B? It seems that SS is regarded as the better fielder - yet it is also commented on that 2B has even more territory to cover... So does it come down to just arm strength? What if a player is playing 2B and has a strong arm? Should he make a move to SS to further his chances to play at the next level? Is there a big difference from playing the left side of the field versus the right side? Sorry for all the questions but I am trying to really understand the difference between these two positions and how players are "seen" or "projected" regarding the two MIF positions. I have seen some excellent 2B players perceived as inferior to avergage SS players - if this is true should 2B try to move to SS?
The logic of it is this (as I see it)-
Most grounders are hit to the short-stop area. The short-stop in a game will usually be involved in more plays than anyone else which includes fielding, catching, and throwing. As such and assuming all else such as arm strength, speed and height are all even, the most talented player fielding wise should play short-stop. But, because all players are not created equal and there is no such thing as all else being equal, the best fielder at fielding ground balls on a team should play short assuming he also has a strong arm and decent speed to get to hit balls.
Second base in my opinion is the hardest position to fill on a team, he needs to have extremely quick footwork, throw from awkward angles on the field quickly, have a quick catch and release trigger on the arm and have excellent running speed. All this combined makes for a very hard to fill position. Often times the worst arm will end up filling in at second because generally speaking they make the least distance throw on a team besides first base. At the pre-hs and hs levels you can almost always guess who has the weakest arms on teams- they are almost always playing second base. The part I find strangely non-coincedental is that the same weak armed kids playing second are also some of the worst fielding kids on the team- go figure!
Most infield plays in a game are on ground balls and throwing runners out at first. Strategy wise, a second baseman has not only greater ground to cover, but he also must try to knock down everything hit remotely in his area because he has the greatest chance of knocking a ball hit the farthest from home plate and still be able to get up and throw out the runner at first base. Because of this, second base is ideally suited to someone smaller because of their advantage to accelerate from a standstill quicker and knock down balls further away from them. Taller players usually weigh more and as such do not accelerate from a stop as quickly. Not only that, short stop and third are not required to chase groundballs hit into the outfield areas behind them, dive at them and come up firing to first base- they would seldom get anyone out!
Some things I have learned coaching the pre-hs level at short and second-
1.Give the infielders outfield sized gloves, they don't need smaller gloves to turn double plays (retriving the ball quicker from smaller mit) as much as they need more leather to knock down balls close to them and get the out at first or second. (the error to double play ratio is overwhelmingly in favor on the error side due to small mits and not getting "enough glove" on a ball!)
2.Put the two best fielders on a team at short and then at second in that order talent wise.
3.Have both short and second play deeper than usual realizing that they have a greater fielding percentage when they have a greater coverage area on balls hit in their area and greater preparation time to adjust
Of coarse this changes as players reach varsity level in HS, but still just some things I have noticed over the years.