Skip to main content

I was looking at an article on MaxPreps listing the "best high school player in each state" when I saw this disclaimer at the bottom:

Note: Players are not chosen for Montana, South Dakota and Wyoming, as those states do not have baseball as a sanctioned sport by their respective state governing bodies.

Is this common knowledge? I was wondering what the reasoning could be, and after my usual 5 minutes of research it looks like a numbers game with very few schools having the population necessary for the sport in those regions, and the weather playing a factor. Still surprised me a bit.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

MuskyShane posted:

I grew up in Wyoming and at the time (1990) we were the 4th largest city in the state with 19K residents.  Likely the issue is community size and then the cost/expense to travel.  The nearest "big city" to the east was Rawlins 108 miles away.

 

From driving I80 many years ago, that's about 45 minutes away.

KLL posted:

Not sure I understand the numbers thing as my son attends a very small high school (less than 70 kids in the entire school) & has fall, spring, & summer baseball through the school.

It is more about statewide numbers than school numbers. How many schools in the state, how many students, and then how many students are willing to play baseball. And then can the school support it. Like mentioned above, when the nearest high school is 25/30 minutes away, it makes it that much harder. I'm sure there would be some teams traveling over an hour just to play a conference game. 

If we're being honest, not sanctioning it is probably the right choice. 

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×