Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

He is 2 years removed from his 2nd labrum surgey and fully functional he has just never regained what I think should be his maximum strength, of course im sure it will never be 100% obviously. Its almost an issue where you almost want to make an excuse for him not throwing in the mid-high 70's and I guess if there was a legitimate excuse that I think would be one.

I dont know, just was wanting some opinions.

Was thinking that if they were that concerned with his 1B-3B velocity then they will bring it up, otherwise we wont mention it.
Eric, I guess that would depend on the kind of conversation you're having.

I don't see any need to bring it up before you know they have serious interest, and I wouldn't make your son wear a neon shirt proclaiming "Damaged Goods" when he goes to showcases. I'd just put full disclosure on the list of loose ends that need to be tied before he signs his NLI.

Most college recruit questionnaires don't ask about injury history. If I remember right, it was the sort of thing coaches asked about in a low key way during the campus tour. Don't know what they would have required if my son had anything significant to report.
My son has had two serious injuries in the past year. First a knee injury (MCL, PCL) and then surgery for a separated shoulder. My belief is nothing less than honesty will work. The surgeon said he's willing to discuss the injuries with any interested baseball program. The feedback is the knee shouldn't be a problem again. With proper rehab he expects my son to throw harder than before. From there it's up to the college coaches to decide. My son won't be showcasing until he can prove he can compete again. This means sub 7 sixty and the 80's throwing. Then he can explain he expects to eventually get back to 6.75 and mid 80's.
Last edited by RJM
Your son's medical history is a very private matter protected by various regulations.

Your son's medical history shouldn't have a bearing on his current condition which is what a good recruiter should be evaluating over time and not in a snapshot.

However, if you accept the "damaged goods" argument then honesty in the face of a direct question regarding the specific injury is mandatory.

The question is: What is the acceptable risk/reward for not disclosing. Is there really that much at stake?

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×