freddy I've read your post several times and it seems to me that each time I read it it becomes more and more condescending. If you don't mean for it to be that way then I apologize but you took a very narrow look at the whole point of playbooks.
Ok so your sons didn't need the playbook - that's great but what about the other 20 some guys on the team? Maybe they needed it - maybe they don't have the knowledge of the game like your sons - your quote raises a few questions
quote:
let's just say it was met with a roll of the eyes when they got home rather than an increase in their respect for the coach.
Did it lesson the respect your sons have for him? Was he a total joke as a coach and this was just another indicator because the stuff he put in the handbook was wrong? Could this have been an opportunity for your sons to have their respect for him grow because he was doing what it took to try and reach more players in being prepared?
I'm like you in that I don't want to send mixed messages and I want to KISS as well but I don't see how handing out a handbook makes things more complicated. You know what / how your going to teach in practice - all a handbook does is put in writing. I agree the best bunt coverage is an athletic pitcher and smart 3B but what if you don't have them? Do you just chalk it up that the other team will be successful in bunts or do you prepare other type of bunt coverages? What's wrong with saying in practice "hey guys we're introducing bunt coverages tomorrow so take the handbook and look over them so you got an idea of what to do in each of them" then go out the next day and have a head start. Now you got the guys thinking baseball and you might turn that average IQ 3B into that high IQ 3B we all want. A handbook will sabotage your prime message if what you teach in practice is different from what you put in the handbook or if you put something in the handbook expecting it to do the job of teaching it and not covering in practice.
If coaches don't want to hand out a handbook that's fine. I've went a few years without handing one out and it just seemed like my guys weren't as prepared. There was one time when I had a team that had the handbook and the vast majority of them came back and I didn't hand one out. Nothing was changing so I figured wouldn't need it. The players wanted it because they liked reviewing it before the next practice. Almost all the great head coaches I've been around or got to know hand out handbooks. Ron Polk took a handbook and turned it into a best selling book.
Kids are different today than what they were 20 years ago. We can stand here and beat our chests and talk about how much of a travesty it is all we want but it won't change a thing. Kids today overall like stuff like this and will rely on it. They would like it even more if we could figure out how to text it to them or write it in text language. It is what it is and a handbook is only as good as what you make it out to be. It's like a drill - if you allow the kids to do a drill half *** then it's going to get half *** results. Do the handbook half way then you get halfway results.
freddy I do apologize if you didn't mean for your post to come across as I took it but it does sound condescending. Maybe I'm being too sensitive or something and if so I apologize.