Skip to main content

i believe and teach that your direction should always be a straight line to your target. so i am against any side movement (aka replacing or "L" footwork)... your arm can reach a pretty good distance out to each side without taking your body there... to do this you have to let the ball get deep - and you all know how i feel about that ( )

its a popular technique taught, sooooooooo how do all of you think about footwork??

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The key is that there is no "bad" way among the three most espoused methods (gaining ground, replacement, "hula hoop" or whatever name you want to give it). My personal preference is, and always has been, gaining ground. I am a firm believer that you want to have momentum going towards your target. Replacement has your momentum going sideways, and hula hoop gives you no momentum at all. Bottom line, though, is --- if it works for you, just do it !!!!!!
that's not a bad analogy. One of the drills I have my guys do during our individual defense period is what I call a line drill. I take them to the outfield foul line (or I just use the warning track) and they set up with their toes about 6" behind the line. With hands behind their backs, we just work on coming out of the chute and I tell them that their right foot should end up parallel to, and on the other side of, the line. We're just working on how quickly they can get there WITHOUT STANDING UP! Then we bring the hands into it.
quote:
Originally posted by catchaprospect:
when they are young, in order to use their legs properly, they can clear the plate........ as they are older they can shorten it up while still using their legs and allow the front foot to plant right at the base of the plate


Please clarify for me coach, are you saying that your instruction to younger players would have their footwork carry them in front of the plate?

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×