I'm sorry I am late in responding here.
I had not noticed a high number of locked threads recently, and actually I have not received any reports from moderators about their decisions to lock threads. But I do trust that those who have posted above are not imagining it!
Of course I've mentioned this before, but it is a tough and mostly thankless job to be a moderator. They are not paid for their efforts, nor am I. Personally I have spent hundreds of hours - actually it's thousands of hours by now - taking care of these forums during the past three years, and I still don't always know the right answer. I'm sure I still make mistakes, though they are sincere ones. And I'm sure that in some disputes I help to settle, at least half of those involved are darn sure I've made a terrible mistake, even though I try to be fair!
Although I lock very few threads - probably less than a handful per year, and I can't remember the last time, at least a few months ago - I'll tell you some of the reasons that I know of that threads may get locked.
I guess the primary reason I've ever locked a thread is either that members have started to post personal attacks, or that I have seen almost the identical conversation or dispute several times in the past, and it has in those past cases led to ugly posts that do not contribute to the purpose of the forums. What about freedom of speech? I think that for the most part, our moderators are consistent in allowing debate and respectful disagreement. But sometimes the debate becomes anything but respectful.
A few times, another moderator has locked a thread that is threatening to get ugly, and sent me a message saying "I won't be around to make sure this doesn't get too hurtful, so I'm locking it temporarily and will you take a look at it if/when you're in your office" etc. Some members would be very surprised if they knew the number of hours many moderators including me put in, but we can't be on duty all the time, because most of us have paid jobs.
I don't want our members to feel that they are being constantly censored or posting in a "police state". But the "moderation" which may sometimes feel like censorship if you are on the receiving end, is part of what makes this site different from the typical sports-related forum. It was designed by the original founder Bob to be more family-friendly, and I would say more polite, than the average. Some people won't agree with my interpretation of the
Board Manners, but the founder of the site selected me to try to carry on what he so generously started, and I have sincerely tried to continue to do that.
I didn't write the original rules, but I have read them many times as I mulled over a disagreement or problem. Have most members read the
Board Manners a time or two? I really think Bob is a wise man and did a great job:
"We ask that you respect the purpose of the forum and do not act in any way that harasses or personally attacks an individual or group of individuals. We also insist that you act in a manner that ensures a high quality of discussion in the stated purpose of the message board."
"Posters will be expected to maintain basic courtesy toward the opinions of others."
"We expect members to agree or disagree in a civil manner. Personal attacks will not be tolerated."
...and many other very basic, solid rules of courtesy.
And I know some members get very upset about deleted posts, but there are times when a simple deletion saves us all from having to read a lot of ensuing garbage. Again, the original rules:
"If you have nothing constructive to provide on a forum (determined by any of the Board Administrators) your posts can be removed without warning."
I apologize that I probably sound like I'm preaching. But sometimes after I've spent 5 or 10 or even 20 hours over several days, dealing with a dispute or series of disputes and all of the discussions and explanations surrounding it...while my real job is sitting there undone which means I'm either not getting paid or not getting sleep, because my real job is a freelance 1-person business...I have to admit that the next time I see the exact same battle start to explode, I may not be able to sit there and have those same discussions over again for another 5 or 10 or 20 hours. But oftentimes that isn't seen by a member who isn't checking the site several times per day and didn't see the previous issue.
I'm not sure if my explanation helped at all, or bored everyone to sleep.
But I do understand and applaud the hard work that most of our moderators put in, because I'm doing the same thing. (FBM, I'm beginning to wonder if there is a rogue moderator in that Men Only forum who isn't exactly trying to uphold the Board Manners. Hmmm-m-m.)
Anyway, thank you to all who expressed your concerns.
Julie