Skip to main content

This came to me while discussing the Penn State scandal, which while horrific in every way is a fascinating study of human depravity, ambition, hypocrisy, and CYAism in a sort of "slow down to see the train wreck" way. But I think this article, from Forbes, deserves its own topic:

"The Penn State Scandal Raises Far Bigger Transparency Issues"

Here is an excerpt from the intro:

quote:
"If, however, the allegations are true, it is tragic for those victims and embarrassing for the university. But the big-picture implications are far greater. It should force us to think about the vulnerability of 440,000 student athletes when under the tutelage and quasi-custodial care of coaches.

One issue that comes to mind is this: Shouldn’t the teenagers recruited and wooed by the school, and the teenagers’ parents be able to receive a report from the school confirming the physical and mental health of the coaches before they decide whether to commit the four most important years of the teenager’s life to the school? And shouldn’t the teenagers and parents receive an assurance that the university has a system of monitoring the coaches that they employ and send as agents on their behalf? I think so."


One reason I think this subject has brought such a visceral reaction from those of us here on HSBBWeb is because the idea of in loco parentis and the custodial nature of the relationship between players - for most of us, our kids - and coaches hits so very close to home.

I have my own thoughts on this, but I thought I would throw this out there to the more experienced members of this group before weighing in. What do we have a right to know? What are your experiences with omitted information that might have or would have made a difference to you in the recruiting process, had they been shared with you?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Edgar- This is a great question. It is terrifying to think about some of the things that happen behind the scenes in some programs and at some universities. As far as a mental health check, I think that's a bit much. All schools (public and private, high school and college) that I know of do drug screening, but mental health checks are something you'll never see - a bit invasive probably. As far as having a plan or a system in place to deal with potential life-altering dangers like this, I don't see that as being too much to ask.
Man, what a mess at PSU. Not good for anyone in college athletics....
Interesting thread. In another thread there is a discussion going on about the level of parental involvement appropriate in the recruiting process. For precisely the reasons identified in this thread, "the idea of in loco parentis and the custodial nature of the relationship between players - for most of us, our kids - and coaches", we were uneasy allowing visits or early conversations to occur without a parent being involved. 16/17 year old kids are not prepared to make life altering decisions on their own. Something that might not raise an eyebrow with a teenager might not smell right to an adult.

In addition - we have always scratched our heads a little bit at the recruiting rules that sometimes disallow coaches to talk with prospects in the open at events or other venues, but they can talk to recruits in their office with the door closed almost any time. While I do understand the intent of these rules - there is something a little ironic about them.

It is difficult to think about what other matters parents / players should be made aware of. There is a great deal of information available if you do the difficult and time consuming research (this website is a gold mine for those willing to spend the time reading and learning). The matters - like the Penn State allegations - that are unavailable are often unproven and as such cannot be shared.

If nothing else, parents / coaches and universities need to be willing to listen when a player indicates that something is not right. The fact that a particular coach or practice has been around for years does not mean that there is not a problem. Players have given up so much and worked so hard by the time they are playing college athletics that they feel they have much to lose by rocking the boat. I am all for tough it out - however, sometimes that mentality goes to far. The perpetrator at Penn State fooled many people for many years.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×