"The Penn State Scandal Raises Far Bigger Transparency Issues"
Here is an excerpt from the intro:
quote:"If, however, the allegations are true, it is tragic for those victims and embarrassing for the university. But the big-picture implications are far greater. It should force us to think about the vulnerability of 440,000 student athletes when under the tutelage and quasi-custodial care of coaches.
One issue that comes to mind is this: Shouldn’t the teenagers recruited and wooed by the school, and the teenagers’ parents be able to receive a report from the school confirming the physical and mental health of the coaches before they decide whether to commit the four most important years of the teenager’s life to the school? And shouldn’t the teenagers and parents receive an assurance that the university has a system of monitoring the coaches that they employ and send as agents on their behalf? I think so."
One reason I think this subject has brought such a visceral reaction from those of us here on HSBBWeb is because the idea of in loco parentis and the custodial nature of the relationship between players - for most of us, our kids - and coaches hits so very close to home.
I have my own thoughts on this, but I thought I would throw this out there to the more experienced members of this group before weighing in. What do we have a right to know? What are your experiences with omitted information that might have or would have made a difference to you in the recruiting process, had they been shared with you?