Skip to main content

In my son's 12U AAA baseball game last night, an unusual scenario played itself out and I'd like opinions on if the umpire made the right call(s). Both for education of the team (players, coaches, parents) and potentially the education of the umpire.

Bottom of the 8th (2nd extra inning), bases loaded with 1 out. Home team down 10-9. Defense was in on the grass to prevent the run at home. 75 ft bases with grass infield and mound. 1 Ump at home using Fed HS rules.

Batter hits a blooper behind 2nd base. The umpire moves up the third base line about 20-25 ft. standing on the 3rd base line and calls "infield fly". While this isn't the crux of the problem, I do believe it was the inappropriate call given that the infield was in and the SS and 2nd baseman were both running with their backs to home plate to try to catch up to the blooper (about 20 ft off the ground max. height). The ball drops untouched and is picked up by the Center Fielder. Closest defender was probably 5-6 ft. It's pretty likely that they would have gotten 1 out at second or possibly a DP at 2nd and 3rd.

Seeing the ball drop, the 3rd base runner takes off for home without tagging. As he is running down the line he sees the Ump in his way and tries to go around him in foul territory. At the same time the Ump is moving backwards to try to get out of the runners way, also moving back in foul territory. The Ump and runner collide with the Ump falling forward to his knees (runner is 5'11" - 150lbs) and the runner catching himself with his hands to keep running (about 6-8 ft. from the baseline in foul territory).

So, here is problem #1. Should the ump have been on the base path (ever)? Should he have been on the 1st base side and not 3rd base side? Should he be in fair territory or foul? Is there such a thing as Umpire interference?

Continuing the play... I'm in the 1st base dugout so I have a really good view of the action.

The umpire is on his knees with mask in left hand and right hand on the ground to catch himself with head down and turned toward 3rd base, so no line of sight for the play behind him. His right hand was close to the base line, so he was knocked forward in the collision. The throw from the Center fielder is up the 3rd baseline towards the umpire/runner collision. The 3rd base runner continues on toward home as he and the catcher brush shoulders (catchers right and runners right) again knocking the runner off kilter. The throw was caught by the catcher about 6 ft or so in foul territory because it was so far up the line he kind of had to run it down (probably 10-15 ft up the line). From my view, the catch occurred at the same time as the shoulder brush and the catcher didn't make the tag on the runner.

Keep in mind that all this action was occurring behind the Umpire with his head turned toward 3rd.

His ruling on calling the runner out at Home was that he jumped over the catcher which is illegal in HS rules. While they did collide there was never a jumping, simply the off balance running that occurs after bumping the catcher, with perhaps 1 leg in the air as he was catching his balance.

So, problem #2. If, the Ump doesn't see the play (which I contend that he didn't) how should he call it? Because even if there was a tag, he would not have seen it since it was behind his back away from his line of sight. Given that the throw was up the line and where the catcher caught it in foul territory, there wouldn't have even been a play at the plate if not for the initial Ump/runner collision. Could the Umpire have taken that into account? What recourse is there for umpire interference?

The umpire went to his car immediately leaving no option for protest or getting the ruling correct (if it was improper).

Unfortunately, he had been doing a pretty decent job for the other 7 2/3 innings, so he's not a bad ump but started a series of events beginning with the questionable in-field fly call.

Thanks all.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Ouch.
No there is no umpire Int, unless against F2 on a throw or a batted ball.

No the umpire should not be in the baseline. If he was good for 7 2/3, sounds like he simply out hustled himself on the flyball and forgot where he was? 20'-25' sounds too far, but if he needed an angle for the catch no catch, his primary concern, hard to say? But he should be out, out, out, of the baseline?

Did he confidently signal and announce the INF? If so he judged it to be one, with out seeing it live I can't help you much there..
Question for ya though, had INF not been called and D turned the DP, would you have insisted it was an INF? Not insinuating a thing here, I still play, umpired for 30 plus years and coached for 20, so I look at things in a skewed manner I'll admit.

The rest; well, at least he kept digging once he got going. But he has to call "what he does see", we'll never know what that was. But I doubt he just came up with "jumping the D" without something putting that in his head, I hope anyway.

From your description, slight shoulder to shoulder, I can visualize the runner being jostled and twisting his body right forcing a foot upward in a manner to catch his balance as you say, F2 made a swipe tag twisting to his right as well and his momentum carried him into (if not beyond) the base line and perhaps pretty low to the ground.. Were I paid to come up with an answer, I'd guess; as the umpire turned his head back to see, in a direct line with F2 and the runner, it probably looked like he "must have" hurdled him. He mighta saw runners foot somewhere above (as in higher than not necessarily over) and behind F2) it musta looked as if R was just landing.

In the same situation, I would not call the hurdle, unless I actually saw it. Even if it really did happen. I would have signaled safe as I didn't see a tag, I'd a called safe on a missed HP appeal, cause I didn't see him miss it.

Just goes to show, one man is bad enough, throw one little glitch in it and it can go bad in a hurry.

As an umpire I love one man, great work out, very challenging, but realiz and accept; there are many short comings and if teams are going to employ it, they have to know and accept that as well.
With bases loaded and a possible IFF, the PU has to stay at the plate. All he can do is go a little left and back to see the catch and what the runner at third is doing. Whether it is actually an IFF is solely his judgment, nothing you are going to be able to discuss with him there. If he does feel that going up the line is the thing to do, he has to do it in foul and no more than 15ft. None of the contact between him and the runner matters, no UI on this type of contact. The contact between the runner and catcher sounds like obstruction. If the catcher does not have the ball, even if he is going to catch it, then he has to give way to the runner. The out for jumping the catcher, he can't call if he really didn't see it. You can't guess an out.
Unfortunately the umpire had a series of weird things happen to make a fairly routine play blow up.
Hi Guys,

Thanks for the responses.

I know the INF is a tough judgement call, and realistically, the call could have prevented the double play on 2 and 3 given the location of the ball. The 2nd base runner was standing on the bag and the 1st base runner about 15' feet from 1st. I don't think I would have argued for it in this case and chalked it up to the worst possible place to hit a blooper, given it's low trajectory and infield up, which made it anything but a routine catch.

I think where the Ump really got him self in trouble was being over-zealous in making sure he did call the INF. Which he did do loud and pretty quickly. He focused so quickly on the INF that he completely forgot about where he was and where he should have been.

The runner/catcher contact is just as jjk describes, the runner being jostled and off balance sort of hops to regain balance which is about when the Ump was turning back to see the end of the play. Guessing what was going through his mind is that it looked like the end of a jump over so it must have been.

Michael, the contact on Runner and Catcher was pretty much bang-bang. The ball passed in front of the runner in a way that the catcher caught the ball away from the runner on his left side, they bump and he tried to swipe tag but the runner was already by him. Definitely incidental as the runner was trying to avoid the catcher and tag, but enough to cause the unbalance.

It just stinks that there isn't any type of remedy for an Ump having that kind of direct physical impact on an out. Even if the catcher had caught the ball at home plate and was waiting for the runner, we'd still feel robbed because of the Ump collision.

Thanks!
#1 problem is one umpire calling a game. All mechanics and most rulings go out the window when there is only one umpire. It changes everything about the mechanics of calling and the outcomes. If I had just got hit by a runner and yelled at by coaches and fans who could not pay for two umps or whatever the case, I would go directly to my car too. This is why there should never be one ump calling unless it is coach pitch.

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×