Under Armour Catchers Gear?

What gear are you talking about? Where can it be seen?

That is my problem I can't find anywhere. The Mets Catcher was wearing it on Sunday night on the ESPN game; and the photo below is the only shot I can find of it on the internet. Anyone know anymore? My son is getting close to needing new gear, and I think he would love a set of this. Even the right colors in the photo Black w Orange.

The gear is All-Star gear that has been private labeled for Under Armour. Paul Bako of the Reds wears it as well.

I guess I would expect them to market & sell this product under their umbrella sometime soon if they are putting it on pro catchers???

Yes, This Is All-Star Catcher's Gear w/ The Under Armour Logo On It, I Have Heard Personally It Is In Production Along w/ Catcher's Mitts, Hockey Style Catcher's Helmets, & Fielder Gloves, & Maybe Even Soon, Baseball/Softball Bats !!!! We Can Only Hope & Pray !!!!

quote:

We Can Only Hope & Pray !!!!

So they can jack the prices up even more! Soon, an aluminum bat is gonna cost $600 because it has the UA logo on it..

I agree, I really don't see what all the fuss about UA is. Yeah, they make good stuff, but I can find similar stuff for much less that is very comparable. UA stuff is decent, but overpriced! Their shoes are just overpriced, IMO.

does anyone know now where to get it by any chance?

UA catchers equipment is a copy of All star equipment I have the Reebok equiment and it's very good it has memory foam in the chest protector so when you block the ball it doesen't bounce all over the place and the shin gaurds are adjustible so when you get taller you can adjust the knee pocket, and i had it for two years and it still looks like new i probly used it in 60 games

This stuff will never be sold on the market, but I do know that the new All Star gear will be coming out this fall.

WWW.BASEBALLPLUSONLINE.COM

I JUST SAW THAT YOU CAN PRE ORDER THE UNDER ARMOUR CATCHERS GEAR ON THAT SITE.

Baseballplusonline.com has the under armour catchers gear for sale

looks good, but way too expensive for something unproven.

quote:

Originally posted by fullertonowlz:
looks good, but way too expensive for something unproven.

OK, what is proven catchers equipment?


Look into hand injuries/nerve damage that happen to catchers. None of the gloves protect the hand enough,from what I read.

below is a link about vascular, nerve damage that is done to the catcher who plays on a daily bases. They conclude that the catcher catches about 300 ball a day.


http://www.empowereddoctor.com...ers-mitts-cushioning


Got interested in catcher injuries after my son got injured on his mitt hand, he broke the bone below his little finger after a bad throw that got him out of position and caused a collision at home plate. He was wearing a All-star mitt. When we went to get an x ray of his hand he show the doctor a contusion from a foul ball that that hit him right below his arm pit of his mitt arm(which happened the night before in a game). It just missed his chest protector. What the heck we will x ray that too, the doctor said in passing. Found out later that he been playing with two broken ribs.

All of his catching equipment is All-Star, please tell me what proven equipment is.

My son loves the #2 position, still. I asked him about his hand and he said it tingles sometimes. I did get him palm guard for his mitt hand.

Helmets are tested but what about mitts and chest protection. I have seen catchers double over after taking a hard foul ball in the chest.


IMHO,

drill

I got the first generation TPX catchers gear when it came out. They had never done it before, and if I were to go back, I probably would have gone a different route. But now I see their gear and it has greatly improved.

I just think having gear from a company that has been doing it for a while might provide something that has been tested, revamped, and improved over the years. Just looking at the description, there is nothing special about it, aesthetically it looks good, but performance is more important.

"Proven" to me is being used at all levels of play, not just the pros, because those guys are using it because of the contracts they sign. Talking about it with others who have used the product and getting their feedback on it.

For $150, it seems like they are pricing themselves out of a lot the market. Under Armour is usually overpriced anyways.

And for the hand cushioning, I recommend the Cutters fielder glove. It comes with a splint to prevent hyperextension of the thumb.

http://store.cuttersgloves.com...ball/018x-01_s_l.htm

quote:

Originally posted by fullertonowlz:
I got the first generation TPX catchers gear when it came out. They had never done it before, and if I were to go back, I probably would have gone a different route. But now I see their gear and it has greatly improved.

I just think having gear from a company that has been doing it for a while might provide something that has been tested, revamped, and improved over the years. Just looking at the description, there is nothing special about it, aesthetically it looks good, but performance is more important.

"Proven" to me is being used at all levels of play, not just the pros, because those guys are using it because of the contracts they sign. Talking about it with others who have used the product and getting their feedback on it.

For $150, it seems like they are pricing themselves out of a lot the market. Under Armour is usually overpriced anyways.

And for the hand cushioning, I recommend the Cutters fielder glove. It comes with a splint to prevent hyperextension of the thumb.

http://store.cuttersgloves.com...ball/018x-01_s_l.htm

This gear has been around, tested, and used. It is All-Star gear. They make it private label for UA, put an Under Armour logo on it for them, and UA marks it up.

All-Star gear is "proven" and worn at all levels, especially at the MLB level.

I know they used to do that, but now it is full-fledged Under Armour gear. No longer relying on All-Star. I'm pretty sure Under Armour would not be allowed to sell equipment made by All-Star, even if their logo is all over it.

as exemplified by Matt Wieters, this change has just happened this year.

Under Armour label on all-star gear


under armour




this is actually the new line for all-star

Looks like the chest protector is still "very close" to the All-Star protector. I would be willing to bet All-Star is still producing the gear for them, just with some slight changes.

Plus, the mask still has the I-Bar Vision tag which is trademarked to All-Star.

I will try to do some checking with some reps I know and see what I can find out.

It is made by All Star.

I have seen a few catchers switch out the padding on their masks and use the All-Star frame.



after some browsing, you guys are right, still being produced by all star, judging from the back straps. so basically anyone who buys it would be paying for the "label" of under armour.

True. But you have to admit, the UA logo is cool. But is it just me, or does the gear made for UA seem much less bulky (in a good way)? I feel like the gear Varitek uses is thick and can be annoying. Wieters fits nice and snug and its thinner, so conforms more to the body. Is it my imagination?

Yes, it is your imagination. It is called good branding by UA.

baseball express is now selling it, and they have black/orange

http://www.baseballexp.com/Cat.../1/view/44/index.cat

quote:

Originally posted by redbird5:
Yes, it is your imagination. It is called good branding by UA.

Very true. But the different appearance in "bulk" between Varitek and Wieters gear may also be attributed to the men wearing the equipment. Both are listed at 230 lbs but Wieters is 2" taller and 14 years younger. Even at the pro level there is going to be a noticable physical difference between a 37 yr old and a 23 yr old.

The new Under Armour gear is definitely produced by All-Star or at the very least UA has paid to use the same technology. The UA protectors feature the DeltaFlex™ harnessing system and Aegis Microbe Shield® - both of which were previously exclusive to All-Star. Take a look at the shinguards too. Minus the UA logos they are identical to All-Star.

I am a fan of UA's core business of base layers/apparel, regardless of the fact that it is usually over-priced. But I have to wonder what benefit, other than sporting a UA logo, the new UA CP can claim (for $25 more than the new System 7 CP from All-Star) when it doesn't seem to actually incorporate any of UA's proprietary technology. Though I have to admit it is a strong brand that can get customers to pay more to be walking (or in this case crouching) billboards.

fsmjunior.

Personally I would only use All-Star gear. It has the best fit and it has great color options. The older the brand the more quality your going to get. Under Armour is trying to stretch its market too far. I would take a look at either All-Star or Mizuno gear both worn by Major Leaugers everywhere.

I just got UA gear and it is just like it looks. It is very lightweight and is more snug than Easton gear. I highly suggest getting some.

The Under Armour gear is made by All-Star and you can find it on baseballplusonline.com

yes it is made by all star just with name of under armor I own a set of it very nice gear fits great and the legs dont slide around everywhere.