Skip to main content

Who needs pitch counts?

Certainly not the Texas Rangers, according to Nolan Ryan. He is instilling the philosophy in the organization top to bottom that “you start a game to finish is” and forget about pitch counts.

Now I certainly don’t have the experience in this area of a Nolan Ryan, but I like his approach and I agree with TR Hits byline that “Kids today don’t throw enough”. My son has been a long tosser since 12 and throws LT daily even the day after pitching. (abet not as aggressive). He does band work daily, and warms up properly, he runs after pitching, does not use ice, and generally follows Mr. Ryan’s approach. (with assistance from Alan Jaeger) He usually completes games (typically 100 pitches) he says he feels like he could throw 3 more innings with no problems.

This will be interesting to watch as I think baseball is becoming too “pitch count focused” and not “pitch count prepared” through long toss, band, stretching, running, etc.

Article:

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/ne...&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
about your 12 year old son.


I see where your misunderstanding came from.. He said "since he was 12" so he must be older? Wink

I am a huge proponent of THROWING more and pitching less. This topic with Nolan Ryan and the Rangers' program was brought up a few weeks ago as well. I think it's great and I couldn't believe the lack of preparation professional players take to get ready. They have a long season so their arms need to be in tip-top shape or there will be multiple injuries.

That said, not everything done at the professional level will work with youth athletes. But strengthening the arm through long toss is something every ballplayer should do IMO.
quote:
That said, not everything done at the professional level will work with youth athletes. But strengthening the arm through long toss is something every ballplayer should do IMO.


Absolutely agree 100%. My comments were in regard to Nolan Ryan's "you're there to pitch the whole game" thinking. I don't have a problem with that thinking at all for grown, mature adults paid to do what they do. They make their own decisions. My concern is about the fool youth coaches who want to apply the same thinking to middle schoolers, and to a lesser degree high schoolers.

"since" sometimes translates to "because"...but not when you read too fast. Red Face
Last edited by Tx-Husker
quote:
Originally posted by Tx-Husker:
Pretty soon I'm sure we'll be seeing a bunch of youth coaches quoting Nolan Ryan and throwing their 9-14u kids complete games regardless of pitch counts because "Nolan said so and he knows more than you". What's good for a grown mature adult isn't always good for a teen or pre-teen. His approach is scary for kids...
From LL through high school I completed every game I started. In high school I often relieved in one other game during the week. I never had a sore arm. Pre high school I threw all summer; baseballs, tennis balls, whiffle balls and newspaper stuffed Dixie cups. What I didn't do was pitch 100 innings of travel ball every year starting at age nine. And I didn't play baseball from October until March.
Last edited by RJM
I teach my guys to "finish what they start" and think it can work at all levels if you

1. Teach them to throw strikes
2. Teach them to be efficient in their mechanics
3. Teach the defense to make plays behind the pitcher
4. Make the pitcher's conditioning a priority to be able to handle the long haul

A pitcher who goes 3 - 2 on every hitter and / or 1 or 2 runners on base will not finish what they start. Might be lucky to just qualify for the win.
quote:
Originally posted by RJM:
Pre high school I threw all summer; baseballs, tennis balls, whiffle balls and newspaper stuffed Dixie cups. What I didn't do was pitch 100 innings of travel ball every year starting at age nine. And I didn't play baseball from October until March.


I think RJM has it spot on. Kids in the past threw alot - but pitched much less. They also got "active rest" The players that have problems today are that they are not throwing and preparing their arm for pitching and then go out and pitch 10-15 innings in a week-end year round with out rests.

I am not sure about the pro's but there seems to be a "baby the pitcher" approach in the pros and not letting them train their arms for the task at hand.

I see it in HS where kids do not get in proper LT at practice and very few really know how to prepare themselves pre and post game.
Guess what - kids from the Dominican get sore arms and drop out of the game. Pitchers from the past got sore arms and dropped out of the game. A lot of Japanese kids develop sore arms and other injuries and drop out of the game. When I was in LL and Pony league kids threw complete games got sore arms and dropped out of the game. Guys who went to Jaeger develop sore arms and drop out of the game.

There is no one right way for every pitcher. Every pitcher is different and you have to experiment to see what works best for the individual. Not only that but they change as they grow.

I threw tennis balls when I was a kid and my arm always hurt afterwards. I threw complete games and my elbow ached toward the end of the game. Everyone is different, especially Nolan Ryan. I'd wait and see how their little experiment works out before you try it yourself. My guess is that they'll weed out some very good pitchers in the process of finding a few pitchers with rubber arms who may or may not have MLB talent.
Last edited by CADad
quote:
My guess is that they'll weed out some very good pitchers in the process of finding a few pitchers with rubber arms who may or may not have MLB talent.


A pitcher sitting on the DL doesn't do the team any good.

Example: Chris Carpenter with the Cardinals. Sure, he's a great pitcher; was supposed to be the ace of the staff in 2009.. and 2008, and 2007. Instead, he's spent almost the entire time on the DL. As far as I'm concerned, it's time to cut him loose because he is no longer reliable and he is slowing the Cards down. Meanwhile, there are other pitchers who may not be as good of a pitcher as he is, but they will be healthy and they can get the job done.
I am curiously watching how this is gonna play out.

NR should know, that not all pitchers are the same and not all pitchers should be treated the same, except in their conditioning, which includes a good throwing program, something I am not sure the Rangers were good at in the past.

If it was that easy to figure out, everyone would be on the same page.

Bulldog, that's a great idea you got there! Wink
Problem is, there are healthier pitchers than him out there (this goes for every team), but they lack the experience and maturity, some teams balk at letting their youngsters learn on the big stage.
Times are changing, thank goodness. Smile
Last edited by TPM
quote:
Bulldog, that's a great idea you got there! Wink
Problem is, there are healthier pitchers than him out there (this goes for every team), but they lack the experience and maturity, some teams balk at letting their youngsters learn on the big stage.


TPM, the Cardinals had the chance to pick up Jake Peavy this past offseason. Reasons they wouldn't sign him: $$ of course, Mr. De(wallet) as they call him wasn't going to open his wallet; also, "we got Chris Carpenter and we don't need him."

Gee, even if Carp had stayed healthy, just think if the Cardinals had Carpenter and Peavy on consecutive days in the rotation-- they'd win nearly every series just like that!

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×