Skip to main content

Grady Sizemore is a reluctant cover model and THE player Little Leaguers should aspire to play like

Jim Ingraham (Cleveland Indians Beat Writer)
05/10/2007

The wonderful and irresistible irony of Grady Sizemore, of course, is that he is the charismatic personification of that most cherished yet vanishing of American characteristics: total obliviousness to greatness.

The very qualities that make Sizemore, in the words of Indians general manager Mark Shapiro in this week's Sports Illustrated cover story, "one of the greatest players of our generation" - and in refreshing contrast to the yowling, howling, chest-pounding neanderthalic posturing of many of today's wanna-be-greats - totally eludes him.

Sizemore truly has no idea why everyone is so enamored with him, what he does for a living and how he goes about doing what he does for a living. That, in itself, makes him the irresistible superstar. He is the son every father ever wanted, the boyfriend for her daughter every mother ever dreamed of, the unselfish you're-more-important-than-me teammate to which every teammate gravitates, the hustling, stay-out-of-trouble-off-the-field, do-everything-right-on-it, ego-free, team-first package of professionalism every organization craves.

Grady Sizemore is everything that's right about professional sports. So sit back and enjoy the show. There aren't many of these guys around. In an era of unrestrained self promotion, when even the most illiterate of athletes speak of themselves in cluelessly grandiose terms, frequently referring to themselves in the third person, Sizemore has trouble talking about himself in the first person. Approach him in the Indians' clubhouse for a comment on another one of his remarkable diving catches, clutch hits or stolen bases, and The Oblivious Superstar whom White Sox manager Ozzie Guillen calls "The best player in our league," shrugs and offers a quiet, colorless response, whose between-the-lines message is unmistakable: "Why would you want to talk to me?" Answer: because you are you. Who Sizemore is, how he perceives himself, how he views his debt to his profession and the respect with which he plays the game and entertains its customers - unwittingly though it may be - all of that makes Sizemore special. Especially now. For in an era in which style means more to many than substance, Sizemore is all substance and no style.

He has Ty Cobb's intensity, without the churlishness. Pete Rose's hustle, without the gambling debts. Derek Jeter's class, without Frank Sinatra spreading the news. The further irony of Sizemore is he is now starting to garner attention nationally not just for what he is doing within his profession, but how he is doing it. It's at once a tribute to Sizemore's character, and the lack of it in so many of his peers, that just by the sheer joy, the unrestrained enthusiasm with which he plays the game, he stands out. Simply stated, Sizemore hustles. All the time. He cares enough about the game, the way it should be played, not to mention his obligation to his teammates, that he hustles. All the time. It sounds like a little thing. But it's not. It's a big thing.

Next time you go to a game, count the number of times a hitter will jog to first after hitting a grounder to the infield. That number will be whatever it will be. Then count the number of times Sizemore jogs to first. That number will be zero. When he is playing baseball, Sizemore runs hard everywhere, all the time, no matter what. That stands out. It shouldn't, but it does. It stands out because so few players play hard all the time. It stands out so much that Sizemore occasionally gets asked questions about it. Who taught you to play that way? Have you always played that way? Sizemore generally greets such questions with a barely suppressed look of incredulity and an answer that goes something like this: "Well, why wouldn't I play that way? This is my job."

In a twisted sort of way, maybe that's part of the appeal of this once-in-a-generation ballplayer. Sizemore doesn't get us, and we don't get him. We are obsessed about the fact that he's more substance than style. And he is mystified that we are. We almost have to remind ourselves that this - the way Sizemore plays the game - is the way the game is meant to be played. By everyone. All the time. That it's not is everyone else's problem, not Sizemore's. That, in turn, helps explain the obliviousness he has to his own superstardom. He's playing baseball as hard as he can, every day, celebrating the game, not himself. This is what he does. It's no big deal to him. He can't quite figure out why it is to everyone else.
But it is to everyone else. The cover of this week's Sports Illustrated proves it. There he is, in all of his unassuming glory.
The Oblivious Superstar.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The last ML game I went to I could hardly watch. Jogging to first base. Jogging to second on a dbl because the outfielders jog to get the ball in the gap and concede the dbl and then lob it back in. Players jogging out to their posistions and some walking back in. The list goes on and on. I think its a shame that when people see a guy play the game the way it should be played that they are somehow amazed and see it as "awesome". How about demanding that when they pay those ridiculous prices to see these guys play that they actually play the game the right way. Personally I would rather watch any college game than a professional game. Those guys get after it and they are hungry. If your goal is to get to the big leagues the last people you want to emulate are the pro players that are there. Unless you are watching Sizemore. I dont know how many times I have heard pro scouts talk about make up and busting your butt everywhere you go. Run everything out as hard as you can etc etc. That will help you get there. But once you get there the rules obviously change. You then adapt to the way of the numerous. I would be willing to bet that there are many a ML player that view Grady as a showboat for the way he plays the game. It really is sad when a guy gets attention for playing hard. What does that say for the rest of the league? If I am going to pay my hard earned money to see guys play a game I want to see them get after it. I want them to earn my respect by the way they play the game. Players like Grady should be the rule not the exception.
quote:
Originally posted by Coach May:
Personally I would rather watch any college game than a professional game.


I went to a AAA game in Memphis on Saturday and had a great time. Paid $9 for seats in the first row (2 for 1 special) behind the Redbirds' dugout and got two balls, and got them signed, for my boys.

2 of the guys got called up to STL that night and multiple guys on the team had spent time in STL, so the quality of play was good.

It was great.
Last edited by thepainguy
It is very refreshing to hear of this story about Grady. I saw a couple of D-III conference tournament games yesterday. The winner of the tourney gets an automatic berth to the NCAA tournament. The intensity and enthusiasm of the players was something of amazement. I really enjoyed it. I took my 16 year-old son to one of the games yesterday and he can't wait to see another game tonight.
A few points.

1. I wonder if its not only the players who "dog" it, or if it's management that allows it?. Maybe they forgot how the game should be played

2. I don't think the comments can be an across the board statement. People are correct when they say some don't play the game with hussle station-to-station but I think many times we live in "today" and the same instances even happened years ago. We have to remember two things. One, is that tv and the web puts more situations in front of us and very few visuals to use as a comparisons. Two, I remember this huge, mother of all stone porches my granmother had when I was growing up. Thirty years later I drove by that porch and it was very, very small. In other words our perception of how things really were can be inflated as time goes by.

3. I remember the start of my professional career (not athletics) and I was nothing but hussle. As I progressed through the ranks I began to understand the idea of maximization and when it happens. Are the results still there? yes, and some. Do I need to show my bosses and customers that I'm a "hussle freak"? No, because they see the expected results at the pace I'm going. Does it bother me that some young guys making a point? Yes and No. They did what I also did and have to maximize their effort. However, their "young" attitude makes me look like I'm sluffing off, which is not the truth. Can anyone hear deny that they put in the same effort now as when they started their careers?

4. I don't ever recall MLB pitchers sprinting off the field often, running at 100% all the time, or running plays out on the basepaths. Is it the position and the expectations that gives them different set of rules?

5. As far as I concerned college/milb baseball and mlb baseball are 2 different games that can be enjoyed from 2 different perspectives. College/milb baseball is a great game to watch in person with a great seat in a great atmosphere. On tv, while it is nice that it is somewhat available, I don't find it very appealing with the limited cameras, mediocer announcing, and poor overall program planning. Watching an MLB game on the tube is the best way to see the entire game as the multiple cameras makes it as you are watching from different seats with great vision and having the ability to see it re-played, slo-motion, and even high def. Technology today is fantastic from that point of view. Going to a MLB game for me is a special occasion with friends. I would not go to a game, just to go to the game.

I watch the Brewers on the tube and listen to Uecker on the radio.
Last edited by rz1

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×