Am I seeing things?? Did anyone see the kid from the 2021 class commit to UVA this afternoon?
Big kid throws hard at 87mph. Good size but really really young still.
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
An 8th grader? Wow
This is confirmed, hie travel team sent an email and twitter release...I guess Virginia can drop any academic reference from the program. Pretty sure you would have be enrolled at an actual HS to even have a transcript
wait till Va Tech and good old hail state hear this. They will be the Ripken World Series in August. Crazy as it sounds it won't be more then 2 or 3 years till it happens.
everyone associated with Virginia should be embarrassed....but I am sure they aren't
Yeah saw the kid blew up this summer, sounds like a stud but wow. Hard to fathom how an 8th grader knows what they want in a college choice, congrats to him though, quite an accomplishment.
old_school posted:This is confirmed, hie travel team sent an email and twitter release...I guess Virginia can drop any academic reference from the program. Pretty sure you would have be enrolled at an actual HS to even have a transcript
wait till Va Tech and good old hail state hear this. They will be the Ripken World Series in August. Crazy as it sounds it won't be more then 2 or 3 years till it happens.
everyone associated with Virginia should be embarrassed....but I am sure they aren't
Do you have a link to the Twitter page?
Link? Name of the kid?
BucksCountyBaseball
Nov 8
BucksCountyBaseball @buckscobaseball
A huge congratulations to 2021 grad, Nick Bitsko on his commitment to the University of Virginia. Great honor for you and your family!
Embedded image
old_school posted:BucksCountyBaseball
Nov 8
BucksCountyBaseball @buckscobaseball
A huge congratulations to 2021 grad, Nick Bitsko on his commitment to the University of Virginia. Great honor for you and your family!
Embedded image
Thanks
I am sure UVA baseball only gets but so many "passes" on grades. Plus, once they get there, they still have to do the work. Personally know a kid from another sport at UVA who didn't muster the grades and is not on the team as a senior. So much can happen.
Someone revive this in 4 years and let's see where this fellow will be....UVA? Drafted? Other?
It just seems like the colleges are trying to get a jump on one another earlier and earlier, so it has finally leaked into middle school. Is it bad press for UVA?? Good press?? They really dont have much to lose with an offer because we all know how binding that is.
When this kid is a senior he will be a totally different kid. So much more maturing and growth between middle school and senior year of high school. Lets keep an eye on this over the next five years or so.....
I got to know the family a little this summer. They are very grounded and the kid is very humble.
I know that a lot can change but I wish this kid the best.
A boy at my son's high school was a D1 commit before setting foot on a high school baseball field. He's already one of the best players in the state now as a junior so it seems to have worked out in this case.
I wouldn't think that UVA is changing anything with their academic requirements.
Remember, the entire risk of this falls on the kid. If the kid has peaked, declines, gets injured, tanks grades, can't pass admissions, gets into trouble, etc., the school isn't on the hook in any way until NLI is offered and signed (November of the kid's senior year).
All this does is put a scarlet letter on the kid with regard to other programs. In the current baseball recruiting environment, the kid is pretty much off limits to the other schools in that most any school that is anybody will not initiate any contact with the kid.
My prediction is (and has been) that the verbals will continue to get earlier and in greater abundance. The gentleman's agreement of not recruiting verbals in baseball will go by the wayside and the wild west of commits, decommits, visits after commit, etc, that exists in football and basketball today will become the norm in baseball.
This is only the beginning.
Here's a blast from the past: http://community.hsbaseballweb...09s-first-commitment
10 years ago, committing in February of sophomore year was considered crazy. Now we're talking about eighth graders. In ten more years, will we be talking about sixth graders?
FWIW, Max Stassi has had a cup of coffee (30 games) so far in the majors, but he's still young (25). He never did go to UCLA -- was drafted in the 4th round and signed out of high school.
2019Dad posted:Here's a blast from the past: http://community.hsbaseballweb...09s-first-commitment
10 years ago, committing in February of sophomore year was considered crazy. Now we're talking about eighth graders. In ten more years, will we be talking about sixth graders?
FWIW, Max Stassi has had a cup of coffee (30 games) so far in the majors, but he's still young (25). He never did go to UCLA -- was drafted in the 4th round and signed out of high school.
Thanks for sharing, fun to read some of the comments. From the shock and statements of how CRAZY is was for a sophomore to be committed, to a joke about 14U kid getting offers - you are right it will just keep getting earlier.
I motion to address all new parents in the maternity ward in regard to their newborn child's ambitions and intentions in committing to the school of their liking! Maybe while we're at it, we can have a scout observe the quick twitch muscles and get a profile started!
It will make for bragging rights throughout the nursery and for years to come on the play grounds!
It sounds ridiculous huh? - but high school players really are considered "infants" in the world of baseball. It's such a long process that takes many turns and forks in the road. There really is no reason to attempt getting out front in the recruiting process. In most cases, it comes back to limit players options down the road. I'm speaking to being loved and playing the game where the player fits.
I would say all nursery occupants who are 6' 2" 180 lbs and throwing 87mph are indeed prospects. I think this is a win for both the school and the player at this time. Particularly if the player does not want to deal with a bunch of schools recruiting him. If things change, then things change. But he has a high academic school with a great reputation lined up and they have a solid recruit lined up. No harm done to anyone.
As to the academic reputation of UVA, no impact, the kid still has to qualify and that may be a strong motivator for him to concentrate on his academics. I would say, the odds are he will be academically ahead of the bottom third of every major to mid major football program in the country.
I looked at the kid's PG profile picture. My son had the facial development of this kid as a senior in high school. When my son was fourteen he was a 5'4" roundfaced kid.
UVA isn't taking a risk. If the kid doesn't meet academic standards for UVA baseball players he's out of luck. I can understand a kid verballing early to a college like UVA. But I don't see any need to commit before playing post soph year summer. If you're that good there's a place for you then.
Sometimes I wonder if the player's and family's attitude is strike while the interest is hot. But if the kid doesn't maintain projected development interest will go cold quickly.
This is how how easy it is for a coach to get out of this situation ...
"Son, we did make an offer four years ago when you were fourteen. But I can't see you ever getting on the field for this team. We will honor your scholarship for one year."
The only way a kid still signs is it's the right college academically and baseball doesn't really matter.
At some point the colleges will be in hospital nurseries looking for big kids who are already going crib. I blew it for my kid when I didn't sign him up for the 1U Bay Bees.
Isn't it just as easy for the kid? Hey coach my girl is going to LSU. So am I. Maybe we can get lunch in Omaha.
Or
I am going pro.
But most schools will have some interest even if he just maintains what he has and now they won't be bothering him til he decides he wants them to.
I think coaches and parent have to consider the two sides to the equation. Academics and Athletics!
It is easy to evaluate the physical statistics of an 8th grader. All you have to do is look at them and their parents and in general get some sense of a projection of size. At a showcase evaluate their pitching, offense, and hitting measurable one can generally get a sense of skill level and make a projection although not as easy.
How do you measure their academic measurable in the 8th grade? At schools like UVA, Duke, Vandy, Ivy and Patriot schools, to name a few, both parents and coaches need to consider the academics. Coaches must be cautious that an 8th grader progresses academically and can stay on pace to get admitted as a student and not just a baseball player. Keeping the player academically eligible can be challenging as well.
When my 2015 was being recruited, every high academic school requested transcripts and grades before they wasted any time on evaluation at tournaments. Asked coaches why such a request and they said “why get him her if he can’t stay here”
Nuke83 posted:I wouldn't think that UVA is changing anything with their academic requirements.
Remember, the entire risk of this falls on the kid. If the kid has peaked, declines, gets injured, tanks grades, can't pass admissions, gets into trouble, etc., the school isn't on the hook in any way until NLI is offered and signed (November of the kid's senior year).
All this does is put a scarlet letter on the kid with regard to other programs. In the current baseball recruiting environment, the kid is pretty much off limits to the other schools in that most any school that is anybody will not initiate any contact with the kid.
My prediction is (and has been) that the verbals will continue to get earlier and in greater abundance. The gentleman's agreement of not recruiting verbals in baseball will go by the wayside and the wild west of commits, decommits, visits after commit, etc, that exists in football and basketball today will become the norm in baseball.
This is only the beginning.
I hope that doesn't mean we'll be getting all those looney twitter announcements, too.
I wouldn't blame Virginia for recruiting the kid. Most every top program would want that kid to commit to them. He is one of the very best in his class. Sure things can change, maybe he doesn't get any better. However, there is also the chance he gets even better than they expect and he becomes an early first round draft pick. Or maybe he just improves at a slower rate and becomes a starting pitcher at UVA. Virginia is one of the top college programs, this kid is one of the best at his age. Seems like a pretty good fit to me. If something changes that fit, so be it. But the way I see it, UVA beat their competition in this particular case. This isn't your ordinary situation of a young player committing real early.
Still, I wish these things wouldn't happen. Wish there were rules against it. However, there is no rule against it, so the top college baseball programs almost have to go out and be the bird that finds the early worm.
PGSTAFF,
I mean this as an honest question. From your point of view, why should this not happen?
Thanks.
Ted,
I know you asked PGStaff his opinion, and I'm certainly not him, but as the parent of a 2017 class kid, I'll share why I don't like it.
First, simply looking at the "risk" factor, all the risk is on the kid. Once he commits, contact with other schools pretty much comes to a complete halt. The opportunity to meet other coaches, make contacts, build relationships, visit other campuses, etc., ends, so if the original commitment falls through, there may be little to fall back on and paving the way to do so will be more difficult as the kid doesn't have a rolodex of solid contacts to reach out to. Saw this first hand with the change in the Auburn coaching regime. Several kids were on outside looking in after having given their verbals. Some found homes at much smaller schools/conferences and almost all landed with less athletic money than they had committed to prior.
Second, the kids simply don't know what they want in a school, coach, environment, major, etc., etc. A kid that hasn't even gotten a learner's permit is supposed to know what he wants in secondary education? If so, that's a rare kid. The further out the commitment occurs from the kid landing on campus, the greater chance of a mismatch.
Finally, the NCAA hasn't caught up with what's going on in the recruiting front. This is why I believe the landscape will begin to look like other sports. Case in point, baseball players cannot go on official visits until classes being their senior year. Most top prospects have verballed long before then. So they go on one of their five allowable official visits as more of a victory lap to the school in which they've committed, and typically don't use any of the other officials allowed. In my kid's case, we didn't make any visits to any schools outside of a one-day drive from home. Although many schools that would have required a flight had high interest, I wasn't going to foot the bill unless it was a HIGH desire on my son's part to attend that school. So you rule out even visiting some great places and schools and fish in the pond in your neighborhood. Also, official visits are a reward to kids that have worked hard and have nurtured their talent. They are robbed to a degree by not being able to take advantage of these visits. In the other two major sports, you see committed kids taking official visits long after their commitment.
Just a few reasons that I don't like it All the downside is to the kid and none to the schools. As PG mentioned, a high draft kid will be a high draft kid, regardless of when he committed, so the schools are going to lose those players anyway. Kids who don't develop as expected simply won't get their NLI come signing day (or a reduced one).
A solution to all this could take place in three steps.
- No offers allowed to students prior to first day of classes sophomore school year
- Official visits allowed following completion of freshman school year
- Verbal offer must be accompanied with NLI at time of offer. This means whatever a school offers on that day, can be binding (if player signs), and the school is on the hook. This adds significant risk to schools to offer early.
Too much can happen in four years. I'd be VERY surprised if he goes there. I know it's another sport, but a kid committed to USC (football) before entering high school and ended up "decommitting."
Nice post. I think you will see increases in breaking of verbal agreements by players for some of the reasons you listed. I also think the hands off approach from other teams will be less adhered to. I would like to see the whole timeline pushed back some.
I don't think a high profile player should have to spend so much energy on recruiting during high school. That is the thing I like about this verbal with UVA. Unless things change the kid can relax and be a high schooler without worrying or being worried by all the coaches. If things change either way he may have to address it, but unless he is injured, he is in a good spot to play with UVA or go possibly go pro.
Verbal commitments are just that, verbal. I've seen plenty of players in recent years commit between freshman and sophomore year, only to be told weeks before they were to report, "you may continue your education at our university, but you won't be playing baseball for us".
Remember, many of the schools/coaches continue to court many players at the same position. It's a lot like committing to your first girlfriend and she then tells you to stay faithful, while she courts other "dudes"!
In the end, the coach either wants a player or he doesn't.
I know a lot of college coaches that don't like all the extremely early recruiting. However, as long as their competition is doing it, they are almost forced to do it as well.
It really turns into a lot more work when you need to know who the best kids are at 14-15 years old. Especially when you need to stay on top of the outstanding players that show up when they are 16-17 years old.
Maybe the only good thing about it is it gives some smaller DI's an advantage in sewing up some young talent within their own state, before the power out of state programs are on those kids. Still they have to be concerned with keeping them under their wing.
Personally I doubt if the early commitments will ever stop. Even if it would be better for both the recruiters and the recruits. Competition is the driving force
Early recruiting is easy to stop. All it takes is a rule that any contact between the college and the athlete before a certain date will result in the loss of one scholarship for three years. I realize college sports are a business. But if the NCAA is going to broadcast ads every weekend about athletes being students let's give academics some thought. The ad says only 2% will have any pro career at all.
College sports won't crumble if athletes can't be approached until June 1 after their soph year of high school. Let them sign NLI's that fall (junior year). The early recruiting thing is a sore spot for me. I have a daughter who went through it. Girls physically mature sooner making them quantifiable sooner. Recruiting junior high school girls is very common.
i don't see where kids committing at fourteen is a positive. When my daughter was fourteen she wanted to be a teacher. By the time she verballed during her soph year she said you couldn't pay her enough to be a teacher. She majored in forensic science. She never spent a day in the field. She went to law school.
So if these are student-athletes with a 2% shot at a pro career how is it in their best interest to commit to a college before they have any idea what direction they prefer for a career?
Add: I recognize all college athletes odds of turning promare not equal. But we're talking about 14yos. Does anyone remember can't miss 90 mph at 14yo Robert Stock?
http://www.thebaseballcube.com...e.asp?P=Robert-Stock
2005 BA Youth Player of the Year
Not sure Robert Stock is an example of failure with early signing.
When he should have been a HS senior he was a starter as a freshman at Southern Cal. Question was he a better pitcher or position player. He was drafted in the second round.
Now maybe he did receive a lot of hype when he was younger. He didn't make it big in professional baseball. Still he was what colleges look for in a young player. He wouldn't have been a mistake of early recruiting. He might not have been as successful as they thought he would be, but he produced very well right away when he got to USC. Those are exactly what college programs are looking for with these early commitments. Kids that will end up on campus, be able to contribute right away, and then get drafted in the 2nd round. Every college would hope that was the type they recruited and got committed early.
My point is he was as stud of a 14yo as it gets. Yet he still didn't end up a first round pick or make MLB. You can never be sure what the future brings.
Nuke83 posted:Ted,
I know you asked PGStaff his opinion, and I'm certainly not him, but as the parent of a 2017 class kid, I'll share why I don't like it.
First, simply looking at the "risk" factor, all the risk is on the kid. Once he commits, contact with other schools pretty much comes to a complete halt. The opportunity to meet other coaches, make contacts, build relationships, visit other campuses, etc., ends, so if the original commitment falls through, there may be little to fall back on and paving the way to do so will be more difficult as the kid doesn't have a rolodex of solid contacts to reach out to. Saw this first hand with the change in the Auburn coaching regime. Several kids were on outside looking in after having given their verbals. Some found homes at much smaller schools/conferences and almost all landed with less athletic money than they had committed to prior.
Second, the kids simply don't know what they want in a school, coach, environment, major, etc., etc. A kid that hasn't even gotten a learner's permit is supposed to know what he wants in secondary education? If so, that's a rare kid. The further out the commitment occurs from the kid landing on campus, the greater chance of a mismatch.
Finally, the NCAA hasn't caught up with what's going on in the recruiting front. This is why I believe the landscape will begin to look like other sports. Case in point, baseball players cannot go on official visits until classes being their senior year. Most top prospects have verballed long before then. So they go on one of their five allowable official visits as more of a victory lap to the school in which they've committed, and typically don't use any of the other officials allowed. In my kid's case, we didn't make any visits to any schools outside of a one-day drive from home. Although many schools that would have required a flight had high interest, I wasn't going to foot the bill unless it was a HIGH desire on my son's part to attend that school. So you rule out even visiting some great places and schools and fish in the pond in your neighborhood. Also, official visits are a reward to kids that have worked hard and have nurtured their talent. They are robbed to a degree by not being able to take advantage of these visits. In the other two major sports, you see committed kids taking official visits long after their commitment.
Just a few reasons that I don't like it All the downside is to the kid and none to the schools. As PG mentioned, a high draft kid will be a high draft kid, regardless of when he committed, so the schools are going to lose those players anyway. Kids who don't develop as expected simply won't get their NLI come signing day (or a reduced one).
A solution to all this could take place in three steps.
- No offers allowed to students prior to first day of classes sophomore school year
- Official visits allowed following completion of freshman school year
- Verbal offer must be accompanied with NLI at time of offer. This means whatever a school offers on that day, can be binding (if player signs), and the school is on the hook. This adds significant risk to schools to offer early.
Great suggestions. Especially the third bullett. I've seen several kids "decommitted " by the school in the late weeks just prior to signing. All the risk is on the kid in this system as it stands today. if an NLI came at the time of the offer then it would stop most of this early craziness.
Bottom line is - it is very hard to fix stupid. At some point the risk isn't worth the reward, apparently we haven't hit that point yet. maybe some day we will, in the mean time there will players that suffer from poor choices...and that is the way it is.
My guesses regarding this situation are as follows:
He will honor his commitment to UVA and vice versa unless he's drafted very highly and signs.
He's not done growing by looking at his parents and will end up between 6'4" and 6'6". I don't know if that will correlate to more velo.
The kid will have no problem academically qualifying for UVA with or w/o baseball.
Interesting (but long) read here on a lacrosse player who committed very early to Maryland and then de-committed. Take out the word "lacrosse" and insert "baseball" throughout article and it is the same issues, but with a twist. Would love to read a story like this about a baseball player. It seems so much more a taboo in baseball, with back stories never shared or publicized. Hard to fault a kid de-committing for these reasons:
Just saw this on PBR and thought it fits in well with the discussion.
http://www.prepbaseballreport....In-A-Rush-2189067453
My 2022 is ready To verbal. He's seen how much work his 2017 brother had to do.
College Baseball is headed in the same direction as football and basketball. Middle school rankings and middle school recruiting....
nxt lvl posted:College Baseball is headed in the same direction as football and basketball. Middle school rankings and middle school recruiting....
So some HGH may help?
I feel compelled to make one last comment here. From our experience and what I've seen over the last 3 years (son is a 2017, just signed letter of intent this week). No matter when you commit- you better continue to work and improve. You are still competing for that spot right up until LOI day. and then of course throughout your career. Even in our little corner of the baseball world I personally know a handful of kids that were "decomitted" by the school they committed to. Some didn't continue to develop, a couple just lost the competition even though they continued to perform.
These are the numbers that have been reported to PG ( there are likely more that just haven't reported it yet):
Displaying all college Commitments for the last 50 days:
Class of 2021 (8th graders) = 3 (PG doesn't have a 2021 top list)
Class of 2020 (9th graders) = 29 (1 out of 10 of PG's top 2020 list is committed)
Class of 2019 (10th graders) = 66 (9 out of 10 of PG's top 2019 list is committed)
This can all be brought under control in one simple way... take away all these silly NCAA rules and let anybody talk to anybody and commit whenever they like - one caveat- once the college offers and athlete accepts it is irrevocable no matter what!!! You would see a great slowdown of all this.
2020dad posted:This can all be brought under control in one simple way... take away all these silly NCAA rules and let anybody talk to anybody and commit whenever they like - one caveat- once the college offers and athlete accepts it is irrevocable no matter what!!! You would see a great slowdown of all this.
I have another view. This is about college. Keep the colleges away until post soph year. Let the kid have an opportunity to grow up and make better decisions about his education.
2020dad posted:This can all be brought under control in one simple way... take away all these silly NCAA rules and let anybody talk to anybody and commit whenever they like - one caveat- once the college offers and athlete accepts it is irrevocable no matter what!!! You would see a great slowdown of all this.
Agree 100%
Are you dancing? Are you asking?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbzJtP75NqM
CaCO3Girl posted:These are the numbers that have been reported to PG ( there are likely more that just haven't reported it yet):
Displaying all college Commitments for the last 50 days:
Class of 2021 (8th graders) = 3 (PG doesn't have a 2021 top list)
Class of 2020 (9th graders) = 29 (1 out of 10 of PG's top 2020 list is committed)
Class of 2019 (10th graders) = 66 (9 out of 10 of PG's top 2019 list is committed)
Not sure about 2021, but if you don't limit it to the last 50 days, for 2020 it is 43, and for 2019 it is 224.
RJM posted:I have another view. This is about college. Keep the colleges away until post soph year. Let the kid have an opportunity to grow up and make better decisions about his education.
I strongly agree! My kid is an 8th Grader. As all of you know who have been through parenting (I have a 25 year old son, too, so this isn't my first rodeo), kids change rapidly and repeatedly from the age of 13/14 through the age of 16/17. There is no way that 90-99% of 14 year olds have the slightest clue as to what would be the best college experience for them at age 19. Coaching staffs change rapidly, priorities change over the course of time for both the coaching staff & the player, and the right academic fit is complicated to sort out.
Even the very nature of college baseball itself changes over the course of time. My son will be a college freshman in 2022. I feel fairly certain that NCAA Baseball will be a little different in 2022 (and perhaps more so when he's a senior in 2025 or if redshirted in 2026!) than in 2017. More emphasis on the long ball? More specialized pitching/shorter stints for pitchers? More emphasis on small ball? Who knows.... we're talking about 9-10 years from now!!!!
Without even knowing what the trends of College Baseball will be in the years 2022-2026, let alone how my kid's skill sets might fit into that era of College Baseball, let alone which programs will be strong and most importantly not knowing exactly what type of academic study will best suit him, to think that we as a family could make an educated decision now as to what is best for him as a college fit is foolhardy at best, dangerous at worst, and quite possibly to the detriment of my kid's future.
3and2Fastball posted:RJM posted:I have another view. This is about college. Keep the colleges away until post soph year. Let the kid have an opportunity to grow up and make better decisions about his education.
I strongly agree! My kid is an 8th Grader. As all of you know who have been through parenting (I have a 25 year old son, too, so this isn't my first rodeo), kids change rapidly and repeatedly from the age of 13/14 through the age of 16/17. There is no way that 90-99% of 14 year olds have the slightest clue as to what would be the best college experience for them at age 19. Coaching staffs change rapidly, priorities change over the course of time for both the coaching staff & the player, and the right academic fit is complicated to sort out.
Even the very nature of college baseball itself changes over the course of time. My son will be a college freshman in 2022. I feel fairly certain that NCAA Baseball will be a little different in 2022 (and perhaps more so when he's a senior in 2025 or if redshirted in 2026!) than in 2017. More emphasis on the long ball? More specialized pitching/shorter stints for pitchers? More emphasis on small ball? Who knows.... we're talking about 9-10 years from now!!!!
Without even knowing what the trends of College Baseball will be in the years 2022-2026, let alone how my kid's skill sets might fit into that era of College Baseball, let alone which programs will be strong and most importantly not knowing exactly what type of academic study will best suit him, to think that we as a family could make an educated decision now as to what is best for him as a college fit is foolhardy at best, dangerous at worst, and quite possibly to the detriment of my kid's future.
I thought there was always emphasis on the long ball?
CaCO3Girl posted:I thought there was always emphasis on the long ball?
Have you watched the College World Series recently?
3and2Fastball posted:CaCO3Girl posted:I thought there was always emphasis on the long ball?
Have you watched the College World Series recently?
Nope, have not. Are coaches actually telling players to NOT go for the long ball?
College World Series home run numbers arent what they were ten years ago but speed and athleticism is bigger than ever. So the emphasis on defense and base running are much higher...
nxt lvl posted:College World Series home run numbers arent what they were ten years ago but speed and athleticism is bigger than ever. So the emphasis on defense and base running are much higher...
A lot of that has to do with the difference in bat characteristics now, it's like comparing apples and oranges. My son's HS team had a season under the old bat specifications where they hit 75 homer us as a team for the year. We have a prolific HR hitter on the team entering his Sr year and even with his double-digit numbers the team is scratching out only 20-25 Hrs a year now. This number will drop significantly after he graduates this year.
CaCO3Girl posted:3and2Fastball posted:CaCO3Girl posted:I thought there was always emphasis on the long ball?
Have you watched the College World Series recently?
Nope, have not. Are coaches actually telling players to NOT go for the long ball?
The amount of bunting is absurd.
RJM posted:CaCO3Girl posted:3and2Fastball posted:CaCO3Girl posted:I thought there was always emphasis on the long ball?
Have you watched the College World Series recently?
Nope, have not. Are coaches actually telling players to NOT go for the long ball?
The amount of bunting is absurd.
Agreed but not quite as much with the new baseball.
SanDiegoRealist posted:nxt lvl posted:College World Series home run numbers arent what they were ten years ago but speed and athleticism is bigger than ever. So the emphasis on defense and base running are much higher...
A lot of that has to do with the difference in bat characteristics now, it's like comparing apples and oranges. My son's HS team had a season under the old bat specifications where they hit 75 homer us as a team for the year. We have a prolific HR hitter on the team entering his Sr year and even with his double-digit numbers the team is scratching out only 20-25 Hrs a year now. This number will drop significantly after he graduates this year.
Mitchell?
There were only two or three kids in California with double-digit homers in California last year?
nxt lvl posted:College World Series home run numbers arent what they were ten years ago but speed and athleticism is bigger than ever. So the emphasis on defense and base running are much higher...
Agreed and that is why catchers with great catch and throw skills are at a premium. I'm biased to the catching position but the evolution of the game with BBCOR over the past 6 years has changed the way catchers are valued at the D1 level. I understand that teams want catchers that can still hit but pre-BBCOR, a catcher that could hit the ball out of the park 15-20 times per year wasn't uncommon. It is these days.
2019Dad posted:SanDiegoRealist posted:nxt lvl posted:College World Series home run numbers arent what they were ten years ago but speed and athleticism is bigger than ever. So the emphasis on defense and base running are much higher...
A lot of that has to do with the difference in bat characteristics now, it's like comparing apples and oranges. My son's HS team had a season under the old bat specifications where they hit 75 homer us as a team for the year. We have a prolific HR hitter on the team entering his Sr year and even with his double-digit numbers the team is scratching out only 20-25 Hrs a year now. This number will drop significantly after he graduates this year.
Mitchell?
There were only two or three kids in California with double-digit homers in California last year?
I don't use names, not comfortable doing that in a public forum.
i know a couple of golfers committed in 7th and 8th grade a few years back to big div1, they hadnt even decided what high school they were going too. it worked out though both big time players and 1 even made it into the us open as a 15 yr old.
Gunner, I think many of the same external challenges would exist for a young golfer to commit... is it the right fit from a school standpoint, right major, size, academic level, distance from home, etc. And those are very important.
However, I think we are talking apples and oranges with regard to the sport specifically. A polished young golfer who shows good course management and the ability to handle pressure at big events is a much safer bet to be a top performer five, six, seven years later. He won't have grown men throwing the golf ball at him 94mph with movement to see if he can still hit it 
Ted Williams to Sam Snead: You only have to hit a stationary ball.
Snead's reply: But I have to play my foul balls.
so of interest I know of a high level 2018 commited to top SEC program when he was a 9th grader. was throwing 90 then and still throwing just about the same now, apparantly after seeing him at WWWBA a few weeks ago they (SEC team) are now telling the travel team they have reservations. expected him to be further along at this point.
gunner34 posted:so of interest I know of a high level 2018 commited to top SEC program when he was a 9th grader. was throwing 90 then and still throwing just about the same now, apparantly after seeing him at WWWBA a few weeks ago they (SEC team) are now telling the travel team they have reservations. expected him to be further along at this point.
And that is how it is
Early commitment means the school is betting on your projection, while tieing up your options
gunner34 posted:so of interest I know of a high level 2018 commited to top SEC program when he was a 9th grader. was throwing 90 then and still throwing just about the same now, apparantly after seeing him at WWWBA a few weeks ago they (SEC team) are now telling the travel team they have reservations. expected him to be further along at this point.
This isn't the worst case scenario. They left the kid enough time to find a better fit. If he's smart, he'll start looking immediately.
MidAtlanticDad posted:gunner34 posted:so of interest I know of a high level 2018 commited to top SEC program when he was a 9th grader. was throwing 90 then and still throwing just about the same now, apparantly after seeing him at WWWBA a few weeks ago they (SEC team) are now telling the travel team they have reservations. expected him to be further along at this point.
This isn't the worst case scenario. They left the kid enough time to find a better fit. If he's smart, he'll start looking immediately.
so ending of the story kid just committed to top big 12 school, ends up in a better academic situation if that matters also.
PGStaff posted:Not sure Robert Stock is an example of failure with early signing.
When he should have been a HS senior he was a starter as a freshman at Southern Cal. Question was he a better pitcher or position player. He was drafted in the second round.
Now maybe he did receive a lot of hype when he was younger. He didn't make it big in professional baseball. Still he was what colleges look for in a young player. He wouldn't have been a mistake of early recruiting. He might not have been as successful as they thought he would be, but he produced very well right away when he got to USC. Those are exactly what college programs are looking for with these early commitments. Kids that will end up on campus, be able to contribute right away, and then get drafted in the 2nd round. Every college would hope that was the type they recruited and got committed early.
Just called up a few days ago:
@keewart posted:I am sure UVA baseball only gets but so many "passes" on grades. Plus, once they get there, they still have to do the work. Personally know a kid from another sport at UVA who didn't muster the grades and is not on the team as a senior. So much can happen.
Someone revive this in 4 years and let's see where this fellow will be....UVA? Drafted? Other?
I was randomly reading old threads and found this one from 2016 - and @keewart asked someone to revive it in 4 years, so here you go!
He was throwing 98, reclassed to 2020 and was drafted in the first round. So, no UVA for him.