Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:A strong and less frequently discussed motivation for the powers that be at MLB is to push more high school players to college baseball, and let the colleges serve as the de facto minor leagues for developing players. The bottom line would simply be to shift a portion of the player-development costs from the existing minor leagues (i.e., 30 major league teams) to the colleges.
quote:Even though college baseball rosters are now capped at 35 players, some schools still have extensive lists of verbal commitments. That makes one wonder how the math is going to work next summer when the effects of the 2011 draft are felt.
44
.
quote:Originally posted by observer44:quote:A strong and less frequently discussed motivation for the powers that be at MLB is to push more high school players to college baseball, and let the colleges serve as the de facto minor leagues for developing players. The bottom line would simply be to shift a portion of the player-development costs from the existing minor leagues (i.e., 30 major league teams) to the colleges.
If something along these lines were to come to fruition would there be an increase in the number of scholarship slots for baseball. Only seems fair if the MLB is going to shift development
On similar lines, if this is truly what MLB is aiming for, they also need a huge push to get college baseball to use wooden bats.
quote:Originally posted by mood for baseball:quote:Originally posted by observer44:quote:A strong and less frequently discussed motivation for the powers that be at MLB is to push more high school players to college baseball, and let the colleges serve as the de facto minor leagues for developing players. The bottom line would simply be to shift a portion of the player-development costs from the existing minor leagues (i.e., 30 major league teams) to the colleges.
If something along these lines were to come to fruition would there be an increase in the number of scholarship slots for baseball. Only seems fair if the MLB is going to shift development
Yes, that would be the hope/dream/an optimists view...the practical/prudent side is buyer beware...with declining budgets and the power completely in the hands of the NCAA...players have been and will continue to be at the mercy of the NCAA Bureaucrats who can, have and do change the game in midstream with the goal of bringing in new blood each year and keeping costs low.
44.
I think it is important to remember this article was written by PG's David Rawnsley. It is not written by anyone who is a decision maker in College or Professional baseball.
The story is based on his thoughts. Being that he is very knowledgeable, his thoughts are always interesting.
Based on the "CBA" things won't change until the end of 2011 which could affect the 2012 draft.
I hate that August 15th deadline for signing. It didn't take agents long to figure out how to take advantage of that deadline. I can't see how it helps MLB organizations or college programs. It only helps the agents/advisors of the very top prospects. It is arguable as to how much it even helps the few players that sign on the deadline. They and the agent get more money, but basically the player loses a year.
If a player is legitimately worth millions, then he is considered (by the club that pays him) a future MLB standout. If the player also believes that, then is picking up the extra money now, better than getting the show on the road. After all, the big money comes later for those who truly deserve the most from the draft.
There are things that can curtail a promising career, #1 being injury. So that initial signing bonus is very important. I'm not against a player getting as much as he deserves, I'm just against that August deadline and that last day frenzy. I don't think I'm alone with that opinion. The way it is now, you know that certain players are not going to sign before the very last day. Some have gone right to the very last minute. How can that be any advantage what-so-ever to MLB organizations or college programs. If there were a deadline, how about the end of June? This wouldn't hurt anyone and would actually help MLB and the colleges. It might even help the players. They would have the advantage of the deadline, but still get out there and start their career earlier. It might be hard on the scouting departments who would have to work quickly. But most players drafted sign fairly quickly anyway. It's a fairly small number that "utilize" the deadline and who can blame them. colleges would know who they lost or retained sooner.
These are just my thoughts on the subject and surely there are some things I haven't considered.
The story is based on his thoughts. Being that he is very knowledgeable, his thoughts are always interesting.
Based on the "CBA" things won't change until the end of 2011 which could affect the 2012 draft.
I hate that August 15th deadline for signing. It didn't take agents long to figure out how to take advantage of that deadline. I can't see how it helps MLB organizations or college programs. It only helps the agents/advisors of the very top prospects. It is arguable as to how much it even helps the few players that sign on the deadline. They and the agent get more money, but basically the player loses a year.
If a player is legitimately worth millions, then he is considered (by the club that pays him) a future MLB standout. If the player also believes that, then is picking up the extra money now, better than getting the show on the road. After all, the big money comes later for those who truly deserve the most from the draft.
There are things that can curtail a promising career, #1 being injury. So that initial signing bonus is very important. I'm not against a player getting as much as he deserves, I'm just against that August deadline and that last day frenzy. I don't think I'm alone with that opinion. The way it is now, you know that certain players are not going to sign before the very last day. Some have gone right to the very last minute. How can that be any advantage what-so-ever to MLB organizations or college programs. If there were a deadline, how about the end of June? This wouldn't hurt anyone and would actually help MLB and the colleges. It might even help the players. They would have the advantage of the deadline, but still get out there and start their career earlier. It might be hard on the scouting departments who would have to work quickly. But most players drafted sign fairly quickly anyway. It's a fairly small number that "utilize" the deadline and who can blame them. colleges would know who they lost or retained sooner.
These are just my thoughts on the subject and surely there are some things I haven't considered.
PG - Just how big of a bet did you lose? Its been weeks, hasn't it? 
...on scholarships...I see no chance, whatsoever, of baseball scholarships being increased. Many programs currently do not fund the full 11.7...and baseball, in nearly every case, does not make $$.
Exhibit A - Cal.
...on scholarships...I see no chance, whatsoever, of baseball scholarships being increased. Many programs currently do not fund the full 11.7...and baseball, in nearly every case, does not make $$.
Exhibit A - Cal.
quote:Originally posted by justbaseball:
PG - Just how big of a bet did you lose? Its been weeks, hasn't it?
I am hoping the Buckeye colors will be a vast improvement for PG over the skunk avatar he now displays. I thought they looked great when Rob Kremer wore them last year...
justbaseball,
I first put that nasty avatar up on Oct. 29th. Guess due to the terms laid out by rz I'll need to keep it up there until November 29th. Sure hope I'm not too busy on that day!
Then I suppose I will be replacing it with something Buckeyeish. (Or maybe not) That will only last for one week. Glad that no Northwestern fans wanted to bet. Two teams Iowa can't seem to beat... Ohio State and Northwestern. Ohio State is understandable, but Northwestern has beaten Iowa 4 out of the last 5 years. Last year Iowa was 9-0 and playing Northwestern in Iowa City, after taking a quick 10-0 lead the Hawkeyes lost their QB and the game. Northwestern does have a great coach there, wish some big powerhouse program (outside the Big 10) would take him away.
I first put that nasty avatar up on Oct. 29th. Guess due to the terms laid out by rz I'll need to keep it up there until November 29th. Sure hope I'm not too busy on that day!
Then I suppose I will be replacing it with something Buckeyeish. (Or maybe not) That will only last for one week. Glad that no Northwestern fans wanted to bet. Two teams Iowa can't seem to beat... Ohio State and Northwestern. Ohio State is understandable, but Northwestern has beaten Iowa 4 out of the last 5 years. Last year Iowa was 9-0 and playing Northwestern in Iowa City, after taking a quick 10-0 lead the Hawkeyes lost their QB and the game. Northwestern does have a great coach there, wish some big powerhouse program (outside the Big 10) would take him away.
I will be rooting (very hard) for you to NEVER have to wear Buckeye colors. 