Originally Posted by bballman:
I'm going to say this stats and get out before we get into it again. Just not going to do it. There is no evidence one way or another that a catcher calling pitches will lose more games. I never said that. What I said is that there are many coaches out there whose livelihood DOES depend on winning or losing and that those coaches feel more comfortable with the responsibility on them rather than the catcher.
I have seen HS coaches and College coaches get the boot for not winning. For the college coach in particular, the threat is real. Whether or not the catcher calling the game is better or not (and I am of the opinion that there are times when the catcher may be able to call the game just as well or better than the coach), the reality is, the coach would rather have his job in his hands than a player's. In HS and college, the game is really more about winning than development. You need to develop your players to win, but the end game is the win.
Well, I won’t at all disagree that there are coaches whose livelihood does depend on winning, but isn’t that a college and above thing? The reason I say that is, I’m not aware of any HS coaches who earn their livelihood from coaching baseball. Earn some $$$ yes, but their livelihood? I’d say that’s pretty rare.
But here’s where I have a bit of a problem. You seem to basically agree with my premise that calling pitches isn’t likely to be the reason a game is won or lost, so why is it that so many believe they’re in such danger of losing their jobs if they aren’t calling the pitches? It just seems silly to me to place so much importance on calling pitches as though nothing else matters.
Like I said, the game got along just fine for a very long time with it being very rare that signs would be sent in from the bench. I’m not sure when it changed but it had to be sometime between 1965 when I stopped playing, and 1995 when my son started playing. Something happened during those 30 years that sent the game onto the path it’s currently on with regard to calling pitches. However, it sure does seem to be a generational thing. Although it still can be considered “normal” to have coaches sending in the signs, it isn’t nearly as prevalent as it was 20 years ago, and seems to be heading in the direction of letting the catchers call the games.
Please don’t get the idea that all I’m doing is fighting authority here. If there were any proof at all that someone on the bench calling pitches almost always led to a superior outcome, I’d be the 1st on screaming that no catcher should ever call a game. To me it’s one of those non-issue issues, like wearing uniform pants high or low or wearing a flat billed cap or not. Yes, if a catcher called FBs down the middle on every pitch I’ll agree that wouldn’t make for as good an outcome as changing speed and locations, but seriously, how many catchers in HS would dream of doing that unless they were catching some stud throwing 100+. If a player is that ignorant about the game, he prolly shouldn’t be on the team anyway, let alone catching.
If pitchers could execute really well and batters never got lucky, let alone could really hit, I wouldn’t feel so passionate about it, but as long a great pitches executed perfectly can be pounded into oblivion and weak pitches executed poorly can get even the best hitters out, I don’t think what pitch is called is such a big a deal the job can’t be handled by players.