quote:
Originally posted by puma1:
Thanks for the advisors advice. Just don't really know where to start when selecting one. What makes one better than another? Are higher profile companies more expensive when it comes time to pony up? Is a big company with alot of stars going to give son less personal attention than a small one with less clients? I appreciate your input.
Most players don't need an advisor/agent, most advisor/agents don't need lots of players. A lot depends on the players projection as to the draft. I suggest an advisor for any player who is projected to fall in the first 10 rounds. That shouldn't limit anyone to what they should or shouldn't do, and sometimes the college coach can be very helpful as well in the process for his players. I would not feel comfortable if son choose an advisor/agent who has a very large stable of milb players but no ML players. good Agencies don't make money on milb players other than to collect on the signing bonus. The good ones make money on their ML players. My son's agent took a nice fee, but son got back more than half of it on a unique card and equipment deal and kept it under a certain amount so that he didn't have to pay the agent a fee. He also offered a variety of services for free (income tax preparation). Income tax reporting is a bit different for baseball players than for us regular folks.
Most advisors take a standard percentage, some may take more or less depending on the bonus.
The most important thing, IMO, is making a choice for a top prospect (and that should be your son's choice more than a parents) for an advisor who is selective in his choices and has ML players in his agency and been through the arbitration process with clients. Most large agencies have advisors assigned to each player, smaller agents handle everyone on their own. It's a matter of preference.