quote:
I liked Sterns retort but now lets go further-- if the government is going to legistate sports what about the Entertainemnet field ( Music , Movies) and the legal field, the medical field andthe congressmen and senators.--Who is testing them for booze and drugs
Although I tend to be a tad to the libertarian side when it comes to the value of an overly proactive government,there's a unique side to this case and others like it that I can't let go of.
You see, I don't really care what you or yours do behind closed doors, or with your body, or what you put into your body, as long as you aren't creating a threat to the rest of society.
However, in my opinion that all goes out the window when you attempt to earn income by your image or when you push a product or service where kids are the market.
Don't give me the "not a role model" BS. When you're trying to sell my kids $50 UnderArmour and $80 video games with your mug, you'd best come to the show squeeky clean.
I still feel that part of the job description for playing a kids game for silly-huge sums of money carries with it an implied obligation to be responsible for your actions, particularly where they may impact young people.
If we agree that we don't want high school and younger kids assuming steroids are the means to the end, then every step necessary must be done to eliminate the use at the highest level.
If that means mandatory drug testing at whatever interval is necessary then so be it.