quote:
As far as catching intangible per se, the catching skills debate has always been do you pull the trigger on a youngster who has plus arm strength (and teach him how to receive) as compared to a catcher who has above average C&T skills as compared to a catcher who can play elsewhere or maybe even close on the bump in a pinch.
Let's see if I can translate this. (Coaches tend to speak to each other like this, but we understand the basic meaning - so it works.
Sometimes even my wife has NO clue what I'm trying to say - but at least I do.)
UM has a pretty robust supply of talented catchers this year. Typically, players learn early on that they need to hit their way into the lineup. As a coach, it does you very little good to have a catcher in the lineup who has excellent catching skills, but he only hits .100. You simply can't afford to give up an at-bat.
We're talking about Chad Durakis who is a freshman at UM who is currently hitting somewhere around .300 (I'm going by memory now), but from what I saw on the stat page of the Terps site, the other teams are running him to death stealing a lot of bases. The decision becomes this: Do you keep him in the lineup because he's hitting the cover off the ball, but he's a bit of a defensive liability (certainly with experience, age, training, etc. he's going to get a LOT better - but you have decisions to make for today), or do you look at finding another place where he can play and help the team by keeping a hot bat in the lineup. Perhaps the best example I can think of is the Orioles' BJ Surhoff. I believe he was a catcher for most of his life, and when he made it to the Majors they put him at 3rd base and later to the outfield and sometimes 1st base. (please correct me if I'm wrong here) It's possible that they can teach Chad to play another defensive position, or use his strong arm in the pitching rotation in certain situations.
These types of decisions are where coaches earn their pay. Another great example of this is outlined in the book "Money Ball" where they talk about how the Athletics moved Mark Hatteberg from behind the plate and turned him into a 1st baseman because he was such a disciplined hitter and fit their mold so well. It made a lot of sense for them to do so because his arm was shot due to injuries, but he was still able to swing the bat and wear out opposing pitchers.
I personally am drawn to catchers. I believe it's the toughest position on the field. I build my own teams around catchers and I expect and demand a lot out of them. Because of that, I pay a lot of attention to the catchers on the other teams and that's why I was so impressed with Chad last year. I figure I can teach anyone to pitch, hit, or play defense, but to be a truly good catcher, you have to really WANT to catch. Good catchers have a very different mentality from other players. These guys are hardcore. They love to mix it up. They thrive on winning. It's a very nasty job that punishes the body. Everyone worries about the glamor boy pitchers throwing 100 pitches and coming out of the game. In the double header, the catchers will make far more throws than the pitchers, and no one ever worries about them. It's hot, dirty, you get beat up and abused - and you have to run the defense, call pitches, and control every aspect of the game. It takes a very special person to do that. That's why the really special kids who do it so well are an absolute joy to watch.
Bear, I hope I did you justice, sir.
Ma'am, I hope I was able to shed some light on this for you as well.
Happy Easter everyone! Sorry for rambling.