quote:
Originally posted by Turtleboy:
I personally think a lot of parents, coaches, and umpires are too obsessed with balks. Balk rules require not only an illegal delivery or motion, but also "an attempt to deceive." In most cases when balks are called (especially in youth baseball), there was no attempt to deceive. Let em play ball. It's a baseball field, not a courtroom; and they're ballplayers, not lawyers.
Deception is such a small part of balks, I wish people would take it out of their venacular. To somebody who is not a trained umpire and are asked to explain balks, the first thing you hear is it is the pitcher deceives the runner.
Where is the deception when the pitcher drops the ball on the rubber? If the pitcher is in the set, he has to stop before he pitches, he doesn't if he is going to a base. If he is changing from the windup to set or visaversa, he has to step off with the proper foot. If he he goes to first from an engaged move he has to throw, but not to second or third.
If he comes set and turns to first, that's a deception balk, a feint to first. There are many more that are rule or mechanical balks, deception is a miniscule part of the rule.
In OBR it is mentioned in a note, an instruction to the umpires that was added in the early '70s. It says when doubt of intention, use deception as a guideline.
Call balks, move runners, pitchers learn. Warn pitchers and it happens again. Pitchers see runners move and they think that they don't want to see it happen again so they fix the problem.
If you can't tell, this is a hot button issue for me.