As a second year cadet, we are in classroom sessions, reviewing a balk. The instructor said, that with a runner on first, the pitcher in the stretch. On pitcher's first movement of non pivot foot, the runner breaks toward 2nd. In one continuous motion, the pitcher pivots and steps and throws directly to 2nd base. I say this is a balk, as the pitcher can not throw to an unoccupied base. The instructor advised us that this is a legal play. NFSHSA a balk is...rule 6.2.4.b ...failing to step with the non-pivot foot directly toward a base (occupied or unoccupied) when throwing or feinting there in an attempt to drive back a runner; or throwing or feinting to any unoccupied base when it is not an attempt to put out or drive back a runner; The instructor said that since the throw to second was an attempt to drive back the runner to first it is a legal play. Your opinion?
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Instructor is correct. Not a balk.
Why do you think it is?
AS a player and coach, you teach that with a RH pitcher, break to steal on first motion of left foot. With a LH pitcher, you break when right foot breaks the plane of the rubber. In reality, the runner should not leave until pitcher has started forward motion or the pitcher can "wheel" and throw to second. Also since the runner has not established second base, second is considered to be unoccupied. I always knew the rule to be that you can not throw to an unoccupied base. It amazes me that pitching coaches haven't picked up on this and taught the pitchers to "wheel" to second when the runner breaks.
You are permitted to throw to an "unoccupied" base to drive back a runner or make a play on a steal attempt.
AS a player and coach, you teach that with a RH pitcher, break to steal on first motion of left foot. With a LH pitcher, you break when right foot breaks the plane of the rubber. In reality, the runner should not leave until pitcher has started forward motion or the pitcher can "wheel" and throw to second. Also since the runner has not established second base, second is considered to be unoccupied. I always knew the rule to be that you can not throw to an unoccupied base. It amazes me that pitching coaches haven't picked up on this and taught the pitchers to "wheel" to second when the runner breaks.
You quoted the appropriate rule but I don't think you understand it. The pitcher is permitted to throw (or feint) to unoccupied 2nd base if it is an attempt to put out or drive back, the runner. The only requirement is that the pitchers motion to 2nd is continuous and uninterrupted. Neither 1st movement by a RHP nor "breaking the plane" by a LHP commits the pitcher to the plate (and thereby precludes a move to 2nd).
When the lefty brings his free foot behind the rubber, he is restricted to two things: delivering a pitch or continuing with his free foot towards 2nd base where he can legally throw or feint (to put out or drive back the runner). He is not committed to the plate (and the runner is at risk of being picked) until his free foot reverses direction and starts back towards the plate.
If the first movement by the righty is to bring his free foot towards 1st, he is permitted to step and throw to 1st, or continue to spin on his pivot foot and step with the free foot towards 2nd, where he can legally throw (or feint) as long as the runner was breaking while the pitcher was making his move to 2nd. It is not a balk if the runner then stops his advance and retreats to 1st (FED is a bit more lenient than other codes in this respect).
You have fallen victim to one of the many rules myths. I coached my son for a couple of years and we picked runners because the opposing coach was operating under similar myths. It is much better to learn it in class rather on the field.
As a second year cadet, we are in classroom sessions, reviewing a balk. The instructor said, that with a runner on first, the pitcher in the stretch. On pitcher's first movement of non pivot foot, the runner breaks toward 2nd. In one continuous motion, the pitcher pivots and steps and throws directly to 2nd base. I say this is a balk, as the pitcher can not throw to an unoccupied base. The instructor advised us that this is a legal play. NFSHSA a balk is...rule 6.2.4.b ...failing to step with the non-pivot foot directly toward a base (occupied or unoccupied) when throwing or feinting there in an attempt to drive back a runner; or throwing or feinting to any unoccupied base when it is not an attempt to put out or drive back a runner; The instructor said that since the throw to second was an attempt to drive back the runner to first it is a legal play. Your opinion?
Glad to see you are in class.....baseball is a cruel teacher, it gives the exam first and the lesson second......better you learned this in class room than on the field.......
Instructor 100% correct...
I say this is a balk, as the pitcher can not throw to an unoccupied base.
Except for the purpose of making a play.
You got half the rule right.
That's why the instructor was correct