A post under JustMom's thread about the signing fuzzies struck a chord with me.
Baseball America's College Baseball issue does have tons of D-1 coverage, and about a half page on D-2, D-3, and NAIA, not to mention JUCO's. In their listing of the top 100 college players, 100% of those listed were D-1's as far as I could tell.
I am naturally biased because my son is at a D-2, but scouts tell me that tons of outstanding players are found at the D-2's, D-3's, and of course the JUCO's, yet Baseball "America" only sees the D-1's. Not a single non-D-1 in the top 100 players??????? (My son's school opened with University of North Florida, ranked #3, which had 3 93 mph very impressive righties-none of those guys is worth a BA mention?)
Collegiate Baseball seems to do a much better job of covering the "small" schools (some aren't really too small).
It does seem college baseball is growing in popularity. The Fox regional sports channels show a fair number of SEC and ACC games. Who knows, maybe someday we'll see college baseball scores on the "Botton Line" on ESPN.
My guess would be that Baseball America needs to play to their advertising base, and the Eastons, Nikes, etc. of the world, the folks that buy those big ads, like to see most prominently the programs where they, the big boys, put their money. I wouldn't expect the same treatment as non-D-1's, but half a page?
Original Post