Skip to main content

A little more research and I actually found an "instructor" (though not directly affiliated with that program) that subscribes to and trains his athletes according to these theories. I am paraphrasing a lot, but in short, he said that he thinks the weightlifting end of the gym became popular (to the detriment of other aspects of performance like speed and agility) because it tunes into the "stronger and bigger is better" mindset (to which I would add, it is also easier to measure progress). As a long time gym rat myself, I agree.

He also said, "I visit college programs year after year, and I can count on one hand the ballplayers that actually needed to 'get stronger'; the vast majority need to get faster (and to be clear, we were talking broadly about bat, foot and arm speed) and have more agility. Stronger is important only to the extent it helps them be faster." Again, I agree.

I do not agree that weightlifting has no place in athletic training, however (which is where that conversation seemed to be headed). Weightlifting, or more broadly, resistance training strengthens and thickens the joints and muscles and, frankly, makes them more "durable." I have said to some folks here that I think that ballistic weightlifting has limited direct application (for the risk, anyway) to better baseball performance, but does help the body "toughen up."
Last edited by Ole Ball Coach

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×