Skip to main content

So I was reviewing the baserunning awards table (page 49) in the NFHS rules book as I'm preparing for HS fall scrimmages and I noticed something weird.

Under the "Two Bases" section, #2 says a batter/runner is awarded two bases from time of pitch if a fair batted or thrown ball lodges in defensive player's or umpire's uniform of equipment.

So, consider this situation: a batter hits a triple into deep right center field and as he is trotting in to third base, the second baseman is acting as cutoff and is receiving a throw from the right fielder. The throw takes one hop and lands inside the second baseman's jersey. Dead ball. There was no chance of a play at third base. Technically speaking, you are supposed to award the runner 2 bases from time of pitch so the runner should be awarded second base. In this case he has already easily made it to third base. I find it hard to believe anyone would consider sending the runner back to second base to comply with this rule. It's easy to imagine the anger from the offensive team.

However, a keen defensive coach could point to this rule and protest the situation if the runner was allowed to stay on third. I'm curious how some of you would handle this situation. Clearly, the intent of the rule is not to punish an offensive runner for the blunders of a defensive player, but that's what would happen if this rule were strictly applied. This may be poor wording in the rulebook and I think it should be changed and/or worded differently. Thoughts?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It is usually a bigger penalty because in other codes that's one base. I saw a pro game where a LH pitcher tried to pick a R1 from the rubber. He threw it away, the runner went to third but the ball hit the tarp and went OOP. That puts the runner back to second. Manager melted down, protested the game and **** near got tossed. The umpire was completely correct, it just happen to go against the offense.
For the OP 8-3-3f applies.

one base beyond the last legally acquired base, if in the umpires judgement the runner was attempting to advance at the time the ball becomes lodged in an offensive players uniform or equipment. If the lodged ball occurs during a play when the batter-runner was attempting to reach first base, the batter-runner will be awarded first base...

Thus I would put the runner at 3B
Last edited by NavyUmp
Thank you for your responses.

It seems that rule 8-3-3f is a fair interpretation for a ball lodging in the offensive player's uniform but the rule I'm referring to is 8-3-3c, which is specific to a defensive player's uniform.

I'm wondering why they make a distinction between the two types. Like I said, 8-3-3f seems more fair by leaving it up to the umpires judgment for a ball lodged in an offensive uniform. 8-3-3c leaves no discretion to the umpire in the case of a ball lodging in a defensive player's uniform.

In addition, it seems like there would be an unfair incentive for the defensive players to allow thrown balls to lodge in their uniforms in the case of triples and inside the park home runs. In those cases, the runner would be forced to return to second base if the rule is literally applied.

I guess I could say the defensive players are being unsportsmanlike and invoke my own authority to cover such misbehavior not identified in the rulebook. (i.e. rule 10-2-3g). In that case I would allow the runners third base or home. Hmmmm......

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×