Skip to main content

quote:
Final thought… Rather than everyone battle for supreme knowledge, wouldn’t it be wiser to use all possible information.



Staff, whose battling for supreme knowledge?....I started a thread saying MLB hitters do not swing on the plane of the pitch.....I gave my reasons why they don't....Where's all those who argue they do?.....And, where are their examples of how they do this?....I'm willing to learn if they can show me they're correct in what they say..... hi
Blue Dog

If I had the knowledge you think you have I think you would be in the bigs working with the great hitters and trying to improve them

It is really is a shame you cannot tell us more about your background, that which has made you, in your mind at least, so superior to others when it comes to hitting.

You closing line in your last post tells it all--you have no answers, just a spin on what others say-- always a question to a question

You have to love the internet where all creatures come out in different disguises and hide in cyberspace

Think about it BlueDog, you spout all this supposed knowledge and wisdom and a kid cannot even contact you personally, as in a phone call, to ask a question---why is that?
quote:
Final thought… Rather than everyone battle for supreme knowledge, wouldn’t it be wiser to use all possible information.



Staff, whose battling for supreme knowledge?....I started a thread saying MLB hitters do not swing on the plane of the pitch.....I gave my reasons why they don't....Where's all those who argue they do?.....And, where are their examples of how they do this?....I'm willing to learn if they can show me they're correct in what they say.....

Blue,

I didn't mean you personally though I can see how you might take it that way. I meant many people seem like they need to be the most authoritive. Rather than reading what others have to say.

I don't really care, though. Actually do try to read everyone's thoughts if time allows. Lots of good stuff on here in my estimation. Much of it comes from you.

I think when I hear someone mention swinging on the plane of the pitch it's just a general discription that replaces swinging down or swinging level. In other words, most pitches are going down, in my mind the best swing plane is somewhat up. I don't think anyone is describing the plane of a curveball for example.

I do believe the secret to hitting the good curveball is to get under it, though! How about you?
quote:
My reference is about their practiced overall approach to hitting. Somewhere along the way their needs to be some thinking.


Staff, I totally agree.....There needs to be lots and lots of thinking between practices....That is the key to learning retention, IMO.....Now, we are definitely on the same page....Glad you brought this up..... captain
quote:
I do believe the secret to hitting the good curveball is to get under it, though! How about you?


Staff, I believe the key to hitting any pitch is recognition (location and speed).....Then, let your posture and timing take care of the job at hand.....Fastball, curve, it's all the same procedure, IMO..... meeting
Last edited by BlueDog
This is just my own opinion and not written anywhere that I know of. If it weren't for some good results I would be kind of embarrassed mentioning it.

The "good" curveball is almost never missed below the ball. It's purpose is swing and miss and/or ground ball.

Therefore, the good curveball should be attempted to be hit on the bottom of the baseball. It's one of few pitches that hitting the center of the baseball doesn't really get the greatest results. (Linear would understand this being a pool player) If the good curve ball hit a stationary bat right square on the sweet spot the ball will go downward. If the curveball hangs hit the center of the ball. Try to hit the "good" curveball in the center and you miss it or beat it into the ground.

Believe it or not, that exact approach has turned some guys who couldn't touch the curveball into good curve ball hitters.
PGSTAFF - i def. agree with you on the yes we all have same body parts, but that doesn't mean we are all cut out for the same thing... i.e Michael Johnson is a sprinter not a marathoner.. and the list goes on and on...

and to the guys speaking of not teaching the swing in parts.. i kinda have to disagree there.... because there are different parts to a swing... one is starting off balanced -heels aligned... if you have a kid who starts out already in the bucket or stepping into the bucket, why wouldn't you work with him on that (while staying balanced) until it becomes muscle memory... and for anything to become muscle memory you need somewhere in the 1,000 to 1,500 reps... so wouldn't you have to work on that for a while, since that would be a good foundation for begining a proper swing....

also, if you have a player that never gets into a good torque position (which is the root to all bat speed and power then why wouldn't you put the player in a good torque position to help them (and their body) feel it so they know where they should be getting... torque being the separation of the lower and upper body in the swing.. "hips leading the hands" if you will...

next, jumping to the approach phase of the swing, even if a kid is having an efficient, fluid swing (as BLUEDOG has stated) then he wouldn't mess with them or worry about where their hands are in the swing - well if they are "casting" their hands, why wouldn't you fix it??? I mean the further an object works away from the center of its axis of rotation, the slower it is moving (i.e. the figure skater keeping hands in close to rotate fast, moves hands out and away to slow down).. so basically if a players hands are moving out and away from body then the barrell of the bat is traveling at a slower speed, not to mention that they will be hitting around the baseball, get eaten up on inside piches, etc, etc... one thing that is taught on the major league level and only taught by about 5% of other instructors is that the hands are just along for the ride - they actually follow the rotatiing body around, until being cast through baseball as front leg locks at contact.. all the player really has to do is get flats palms as quick as possible....

and skipping contact and power V because my fingers hurt and i am a poor typer, if at the end of the swing a player is not balanced- yet was balanced at the begining then something went wrong some where in the swing... and it could not have been an effective, fluid swing... so why not work to fix the problem and make sure player is balanced at end as well...

Oh yeah, and BLUEDOG... if you think matching the plane of the swing to the plane of the pitch is absurd... then you must teach swing level or swing down.... now i am just going to assume that you would never teach swinging down to a pitch that is already going down (not to mention the pitching coach on your team and the other team is trying to get the pitcher to pitch at the knees to halp get the batters to hit the ball on the ground)... so i will assume you teach a level swing - level to the ground??? interesting... could anyone explain to me how to swing level and hit a pitch at the knees??? is that even possible?? that is like listeng to youth coaches and high school coaches yelling cues like "stay back and swing down".... how does that work? anyone on here ever try and stay back (weight) and swing down??? or hit the bottom half of the ball for more backspin?? if anyone is good enough to purposfully put backspin on a pitched ball, then i need your INFO so i can get you drafted asap...

sorry about the tangent

of and BLUEDOG, i noticed you had a blurb on how to match the planes of swings to the planes of pitches... you do it bu tucking your back elbow (you can't have both elbows up or both down and swing a bat... go try it) so one must be down and the other up - and your front elbow works up in the swing... you have about a 5-6 inch slot from where your elbow can be parallel to working up so you can hit pitches lower.. in other words, your elbow would tend to work flatter on pitch across the letters but pitches any lower, down to knees the elbow works higher... i saw some great pics of this at www.backbackback.com

quote:
The "level" swing has always been advocated. I used to believe it and I used to say the same thing. But the ideal swing is not level and it's not down...."

Ted Williams on "The Proper Swing"
The Science of Hitting, page 13



anyway, i guess Rod Dedeux was right...
"More players never reach their potential because of a lack of quality instruction,
rather than a lack of ability."

Rod Dedeaux

Legendary University of Southern California Baseball Coach

N.C.A.A Division I “Coach of the Century”

Anyways.. sorry to bore so many...
Just reading through the previous posts. Believe I'm wrong about that analogy of the stationary bat and the curve ball hitting the sweet spot. The 12-6 rotation would not force the ball to go down, if anything it causes the ball to leave the bat going up slightly. Red Face

Still stick to my guns about trying to hit the bottom of the good curveball, though. Based on results!
Diablo, you are a bit late to the party.....We studied Epstein's material years ago......The collapsing backside, slot the elbow, sit on the back leg stuff is ancient history.....Swing on the plane of the pitch, weathervane the front elbow, counter-rotate and torque the upper and lower body is not what MLB hitters do......You are brainwashed with that stuff, though, I can tell......Your hitting education is stagnant.....Broaden your mind and move on......There is alot for you to learn, but first you must move past where you are currently stuck..... captain
quote:
The "good" curveball is almost never missed below the ball. It's purpose is swing and miss and/or ground ball.


PG Jerry,

This is exactly why I like pitchers with 12-6 or 1-7 break opposed to flat plane break. Just to easy to rake sliders, IMHO.

Agree totally about hardly ever swinging below ball or making contact with bottom halve as well on breaking balls without decelerating batspeed. Then a wave might create a pop-up.
Hey brother EG, tell BB Shep is thinking of him a great deal these days and miss his input.

Shep
I'm kinda disappointed brother because I did have video turned on and Coach Little even had message for Baseball PaPa at my request...

Thank you sir just the same though and guess what? I have three more but am gonna post them later applaude

Now, back to hitting. Notice how diablo disappeared when I mentioned Darrell Parker????

Shep
Last edited by Shepster
This is another thing. People are quick to use video to make one point while the video is showing an arguement against another point. Guess to get that other point across it takes a different video to serve ones purpose.

Example - Bernie Williams clip
Point... allowing ball to get to you or making contact between front and back foot.

Truth - The video of BW obviously shows contact out in front of the front foot, if I'm seeing it correctly.

I think it's possible to find video that will support many different arguements.
quote:
Truth - The video of BW obviously shows contact out in front of the front foot, if I'm seeing it correctly.



PGStaff, the video doesn't have enough frames to stop it right at ball contact.....Also, the angle could be better......However, my best estimate, and it is only an estimate, is that he makes ball contact at the front foot....

Can't tell pitch location, but inside pitches are usually contacted even with the front foot, IMO.....
quote:
Originally posted by swingbuster:
Coach A...

I enjoy your post and I can tell your a result getter with kids and you know what your doing


I appreciate it Swingbuster. Unfortunately, I have to work during the day and don't get to enjoy the bantering that takes place. I last left it on page two and now I open it back up to see we are on page 4? Wow. I do get a kick out of listening to these guys go on though. It is fun to listen to.
I was getting kind of hot reading what was said in response to my comments back on page 2, but by the time I read through the next 2 pages of dialogue, I lost the urge to argue. I just would appreciate more open-minded comments or at least rebuttle that has specific answers to players/parents questions instead of rambling just to hear one talk (or in this case...to see themselves posted). I do enjoy the dialogue that is created though when we get some opposite views on a topic.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×