Skip to main content

I watched Texas A&M play Gonzaga friday night and boy was the hitting different! Texas A&M was hitless though 7 and 1/3 innings until finally poking one through. I know bats always start out slow to start the season but the game went to the bottom of the 11th and there was never a ball hit deeper than mid-outfield. The turning point of the game was balks. Gonzaga had three (one put a man on third in the 11th to be the winning run) and A&M with one. It was just interesting to see a game where "the little things" made more of a difference in a match up like this one.

Interested if anyone else has seen the impact of BBOCR bats in any other collegiate games this season.

I think the new bats might be a big equalizer among universities until recruiting can be changed.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Hi All,
Just passin' through.
Nuke - As you are probably aware, California HS started a year early. Many of the coaches here though the same all the way up to January, but they went through with it here. I would be very surprised if it doesn't stick for you folks and the rest of the country in 2012. Once this "safer" option is available, the powers that be would really be sticking their neck out by not going that route.
Yes, the school and individual cost outlay is very significant but I think the threat of injury lawsuits wins out.
The good news is I notice the boys swinging more aggressively because they have to. At this VERY early stage, I'd have to say I like it more than I thought I would.
quote:
Originally posted by Nuke:
I would not be surprised to see the rule get retracted for high school ball before the 2012 season. Huge financial implications will surely be a factor, but many HS coaches do not think it will stick.


I doubt this will be pushed back... most bats only last 2 yrs, and the NFHS announced the rule change last year, plus the bat companies have their production lines changed over it would probably cost more to go back... and with what has been seen in the college games... It is here to stay
quote:
Originally posted by 13LHPdad:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by cabbagedad:
Yes, the school and individual cost outlay is very significant but I think the threat of injury lawsuits wins out.
QUOTE]

Good point. Thanks, keep us updated.


As requested, I thought I'd copy a post I just put elsewhere regarding BBCOR and how it has worked out this year in California... you may also want to visit that thread for the opinions of others - mine is probably a bit more "alarmist" than others. Cool

80% thru the season, here's a look at the HS varsity numbers in our area...

I took team BA's, HR's and Runs Scored for the two top leagues and kicked out a few anomalies (teams that changed leagues).

Average Team BA 2010 - .296
Average Team BA 2011 - .270

Total HR's (12 teams) 2010 - 106
Total HR's (12 teams) 2011 - 32*

Runs scored per team 2010 - 6.0 / game
Runs scored per team 2011 - 4.9 / game

*2011 HR's include one team with 12 at home with strong prevailing winds. They did not hit that many in 2010, so difference is really even more dramatic.

Also, factor in that approximately 40% of AB's accross both leagues were with CF4 exception bat, so, again, the difference is really even more dramatic than the numbers indicate.

With BBCOR in full effect next year, I would estimate a drop of about 35 BA points, 70-80% fewer HR's and 25-30% fewer runs scored vs 2010 (BESR).

I think this works well for the top players trying to go to the next level and for the revival of pure baseball and I love coaching it. I still have some concern that interest in the sport will diminish for the average player HS and younger and the casual fan base from college on down (the majority).

The JV and Frosh levels take a real hit - the true extra base hit is practically non-existent there with BBCOR.
quote:
Originally posted by Nuke:
I would not be surprised to see the rule get retracted for high school ball before the 2012 season. Huge financial implications will surely be a factor, but many HS coaches do not think it will stick.


Nuke... this will not happen.. on to the BBCOR bats as stated throughout the thread... it is already in place in the NCAA and was announced in NFHS over a year ago... It is wishful thinking on the coaches part. Matter a fact I have talked with a few coaches and they want there players to get the new BBCOR bats and start using them as soon as there individual HS seasons are finished up... but not sure what the summer coaches or leagues will do...
Thinking out loud:

Cameron and Tarleton State each play in a good D2 conference (Lone Star Conference). Tarleton is ranked top 5 in the region and Cameron is also very good. Cameron has 61 homeruns and Tarleton has 53 homeruns in 43 games this year.

Some of the top ranked D1 schools like Florida State and Arizona State only have 27 and 21 homeruns respectively, and I noticed that there are hardly any Big 12 schools even close to 30 homeruns. I think Nebraska has 27.

Here is my point: My assumption is that there must be a significantly greater drop off in homeruns in conferences with outstanding pitching. Good pitching always makes it tougher to hit, but then you factor in the BBCOR bats with a smaller sweet spot, and pitchers with good movement, and the homeruns seem to be down in a greater proportion in the conferences thought to produce great pitching.

Yes, BBCOR bats are going to lower the homerun numbers, but it seems to have a magnified effect on teams facing better pitching day in and day out. I would have to say that BBCOR bats have not been as big a factor at Tarleton and Cameron so there must be more to it then the BBCOR bats themselves.

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×