quote:
Originally posted by infielddad:
Today's SF Chronicle has an informative article on Mike Matheny, catching and concussions. I was really surprised to read him say that he never truly felt good during any season...and thought that was normal. Also, the story notes the sound difference with the new masks vs traditional but does not follow what that might mean.
If you are a catcher or parent of one, this article has important new information.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/04/SPGQSNUKMU1.DTL
Here's the relevant quote...
First, Conte and the rest of the team's medical staff set out to compare the hockey-style catcher's mask, which Matheny wore, and the more conventional version, a batter's helmet with a face mask over the top. When they talked to catchers, the older mask received stronger support, and respondents said they considered the hockey masks less safe.This is really interesting.
I like the newer, hockey-style masks because they are easier to get off and seem to offer better protection from a wrap-around swing to the head. However, it seems the much bigger threat is the ball, and the old-style masks are extremely padded to handle this kind of collision. I wonder if the metal caging helps to make a difference.
It may be that the Rawlings Ai1 style is best because you get the frontal protection and the wrap-around protection (since the helmet is also padded).